Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

6 Port Aux.bp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2004, 10:49 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
johnjasonanthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: new london,ct
Posts: 50
Default

Hey guys i'm building my n/a engine with a bp onthe aux. port do you guys have any idea how this is going to react when aux. port opens up is it going to feel rough or is it going to feel normal?All the mods were done to the engine the rest is stock.Istill have not put the engine together, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
johnjasonanthony is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:00 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
ColinRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,502
Default

Don't use a stock ECU/FI computer, and I would stay away from the stock intake manifolds.



Mazdaspeed7 did this and said he wasn't too pleased with all the limitations stock equipment gave him.
ColinRX7 is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:10 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
johnjasonanthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: new london,ct
Posts: 50
Default

So there is problably not much power to gain with a stock ecu/fi computer? that sucks !
johnjasonanthony is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:12 AM
  #4  
Super Moderator
 
Baldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5,425
Default

Originally Posted by ColinRX7' date='Apr 12 2004, 11:00 AM
Don't use a stock ECU/FI computer, and I would stay away from the stock intake manifolds.



Mazdaspeed7 did this and said he wasn't too pleased with all the limitations stock equipment gave him.
I think I remember him saying that it was with the S5, and that the S4 would do better with a bridged aux. But I could be wrong.
Baldy is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:16 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
ColinRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,502
Default

Not only not much power, but not much driveability. It moves enough air to max out the AFM and make it run like crap (On stock componentry).
ColinRX7 is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:47 AM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
johnjasonanthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: new london,ct
Posts: 50
Default

Maybe i should use the stock sleeve in the port until i can upgrade the ecu and change the manifolds.that way the bp won't be activated when open.
johnjasonanthony is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:55 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Travis R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 191
Default

That's probably a good idea. The porting itself is a great way to keep low end and then have good power up top... the problem is trying to use the stock stuff with it. It maxes everything out, and the port timing is all wrong for the length of the intake runners. You need to separate the aux port runner from the other ones, it needs to be much longer.

Good luck
Travis R is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 12:10 PM
  #8  
Super Moderator
 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,763
Default

Dear god...I hate to sound like RX7club, but those FAQ's are there for a reason. I have gone very in-depth on my aux bridge experiment, and really dont feel like typing it again. Search my username and "aux bridge" and you should come up with 2 threads in thie forum(or the FAQ's) that have all of my results/thoughts on it.
mazdaspeed7 is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 12:16 PM
  #9  
Super Moderator
 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,763
Default

Originally Posted by johnjasonanthony' date='Apr 12 2004, 12:47 PM
Maybe i should use the stock sleeve in the port until i can upgrade the ecu and change the manifolds.that way the bp won't be activated when open.
I hate to sound like a dick, but maybe you should take care the manifold and ECU first. The stock sleeve will only close about half of the eyebrow. You will have an engine that barely runs on the stock ecu, and youll hate it. The S4 AFM has a lot more range than the S5 ones, but you will still never make good power with it, but more importantly, you will lose TONS of low end and midrange.



Im much happier with my SP engine than I ever was with the Aux bridge.
mazdaspeed7 is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 09:39 PM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
johnjasonanthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: new london,ct
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Apr 12 2004, 09:16 AM
I hate to sound like a dick, but maybe you should take care the manifold and ECU first. The stock sleeve will only close about half of the eyebrow. You will have an engine that barely runs on the stock ecu, and youll hate it. The S4 AFM has a lot more range than the S5 ones, but you will still never make good power with it, but more importantly, you will lose TONS of low end and midrange.



Im much happier with my SP engine than I ever was with the Aux bridge.
Hey i don't mind you sounding like a dick as long as it is to help me out , But seriously guys thanks for all your opinions and share of knowledge.I can tell you one thing my 89-vert will not be styling an aux. bp(thanks)
johnjasonanthony is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
renns
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
14
01-10-2005 05:05 PM
mazdaspeed7
RX-7 & RX-8 Parts For Sale & Wanted
18
11-10-2003 12:11 AM
nod1stgen
1st Generation Specific
19
08-08-2003 05:08 PM
pengaru
2nd Generation Specific
18
12-05-2002 11:29 PM
DJ Rotor
2nd Generation Specific
6
10-29-2002 12:07 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 6 Port Aux.bp



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.