Evoviii Sucks Ass... I Know!
05-05-2003, 03:14 PM
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DE
Posts: 401
Well, i don't know how to break this to everyone, but all the performance mags have been showing some incredible numbers for the EVO8. i know motor trend ran a 13.0## with a stock EVOVIII and that is freakin nasty, what's funny is that they have the same motor as the older mitsu eclipse's, but with very stron internals and a 16G turbo which will easily handle 20psi (stock is 15 i believe). when people start modding these things they WILL be challenges and expect impressive number from average bolt-ons.
05-07-2003, 08:25 AM
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DE
Posts: 401
Here are some specific specs for the EVO8 that i'm quoting from Motor Trend
0-60mph: 4.59sec
Standing 1/4 Mile: 13.08@105.12mph
60-0: 106ft (this beat the Murcielago and Ferrari 575M)
Top Speed: 156mph
600ft slalom: 71.4mph (beat the Z06, new Viper, 575M, Murcielago, SVT Cobra, CL55 AMG, Jaguar XKR)
Curb Weight: 3263lbs
What a nasty little bastard...........oh yeah and they compair it with the new STi
STi :
1/4 mile: 13.23@104.6mph
0-60: 4.86sec
60-0 braking: 111ft (evo8: 106ft)
But the said that the STi hadn't been broken in yet, sooooo it is gonna be great to watch these cars battle on the street and then we fly by in out modded FD's
0-60mph: 4.59sec
Standing 1/4 Mile: 13.08@105.12mph
60-0: 106ft (this beat the Murcielago and Ferrari 575M)
Top Speed: 156mph
600ft slalom: 71.4mph (beat the Z06, new Viper, 575M, Murcielago, SVT Cobra, CL55 AMG, Jaguar XKR)
Curb Weight: 3263lbs
What a nasty little bastard...........oh yeah and they compair it with the new STi
STi :
1/4 mile: 13.23@104.6mph
0-60: 4.86sec
60-0 braking: 111ft (evo8: 106ft)
But the said that the STi hadn't been broken in yet, sooooo it is gonna be great to watch these cars battle on the street and then we fly by in out modded FD's
05-11-2003, 01:14 PM
#53
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 26
Originally Posted by onboost' date='Mar 20 2003, 10:33 AM
I agree on this too, they are not much different, Supra owners, WRX owners, and Muscle car owners are all the same~
05-12-2003, 05:57 PM
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 602
Well, their arrogance in their cars is all on the same level. WRX/Supra/muscle car owners all believe that they have the best damn things in the world.
I find that funny considering that because I have the best damn car in the world - an '89 Turbo2! All hail the FC.
I find that funny considering that because I have the best damn car in the world - an '89 Turbo2! All hail the FC.
05-12-2003, 06:00 PM
#56
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Amityville, New York
Posts: 12,288
You cannot deny the power and performance potential of a
Supra, stop hating.
I bet all the Supra guys say things like "you know those RX-7 owners,
they think thier cars are the **** meanwhile they cant get 500hp on pump gas and have the engine last more then a year"
Supra, stop hating.
I bet all the Supra guys say things like "you know those RX-7 owners,
they think thier cars are the **** meanwhile they cant get 500hp on pump gas and have the engine last more then a year"
05-12-2003, 06:00 PM
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 3,269
Originally Posted by Jerk_Racer' date='May 12 2003, 05:57 PM
Well, their arrogance in their cars is all on the same level. WRX/Supra/muscle car owners all believe that they have the best damn things in the world.
I find that funny considering that because I have the best damn car in the world - an '89 Turbo2! All hail the FC.
I find that funny considering that because I have the best damn car in the world - an '89 Turbo2! All hail the FC.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)