Mustang 5.0
02-27-2003, 11:55 PM
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 3,269
Originally Posted by LannyRX7' date='Feb 27 2003, 08:11 PM
Not sure what he had.. I didn't have much.
Intake,downpipe,exhaust, cold plugs, 10mm wires, Nitto 555's (at the time), some ducting here and there.
Intake,downpipe,exhaust, cold plugs, 10mm wires, Nitto 555's (at the time), some ducting here and there.
03-08-2003, 07:17 PM
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 177
Alright, I've met some really cool people on here. Many have helped me with some problems I've had with my new 88 SE. Thank 2 U! So, with the exception of RX-7 KID (must be what he is), I apologize for offending N E 1 in my first posts.
BTW, I'm not sure what model year the Bullitt was, but I know it was a 65-69. 69 & 70 were the best two years, 1 of which I own. (70 Mach 1 428 CJ) And no, I won't race any of U!! Am I afraid....haha...The only thing I would be afraid of is when I pass U up, U might get pissed and wreck my beauty, LOL! Very rare and expensive parts!! Nough, but in it's stock form, it only runs a 12.7 ET. U might say that's awesome, but this is a big block you're talkin' about. (tons of torque) I have plans to beef it up in the future.
While we're on the topic of 5.0's, my Ranger has 1 in it out of an F-150 that is 'built' and runs 13's when it decides to hook up. Doesn't that beat most of U stock NA guys?
BTW, I'm not sure what model year the Bullitt was, but I know it was a 65-69. 69 & 70 were the best two years, 1 of which I own. (70 Mach 1 428 CJ) And no, I won't race any of U!! Am I afraid....haha...The only thing I would be afraid of is when I pass U up, U might get pissed and wreck my beauty, LOL! Very rare and expensive parts!! Nough, but in it's stock form, it only runs a 12.7 ET. U might say that's awesome, but this is a big block you're talkin' about. (tons of torque) I have plans to beef it up in the future.
While we're on the topic of 5.0's, my Ranger has 1 in it out of an F-150 that is 'built' and runs 13's when it decides to hook up. Doesn't that beat most of U stock NA guys?
03-08-2003, 11:05 PM
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Originally Posted by SeventyMach1' date='Mar 8 2003, 08:17 PM
While we're on the topic of 5.0's, my Ranger has 1 in it out of an F-150 that is 'built' and runs 13's when it decides to hook up. Doesn't that beat most of U stock NA guys?
03-10-2003, 10:59 AM
#54
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Amityville, New York
Posts: 12,288
Originally Posted by 1Revvin7' date='Mar 9 2003, 12:05 AM
[quote name='SeventyMach1' date='Mar 8 2003, 08:17 PM']
While we're on the topic of 5.0's, my Ranger has 1 in it out of an F-150 that is 'built' and runs 13's when it decides to hook up. Doesn't that beat most of U stock NA guys?
While we're on the topic of 5.0's, my Ranger has 1 in it out of an F-150 that is 'built' and runs 13's when it decides to hook up. Doesn't that beat most of U stock NA guys?
is it at least a 5.0 HO or just a 5.0?
03-10-2003, 03:50 PM
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 177
No, it's not an HO. There's not much difference, though. Little, if any HP difference. I think it's just that the HO's are 'roller' motors. The firing orders are different. When I say 'built', I was refering to bolt on's really. Power Plus intake, Holley 750 cfm, hypereutectics to forged pistons, smaller pulleys, and extremely minor porting of the heads. I plan to have it bored and stroked and put some headers on it. Last resort is aluminum heads, but they are very expensive.
03-10-2003, 03:56 PM
#56
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Amityville, New York
Posts: 12,288
Originally Posted by SeventyMach1' date='Mar 10 2003, 04:50 PM
No, it's not an HO. There's not much difference, though. Little, if any HP difference. I think it's just that the HO's are 'roller' motors. The firing orders are different. When I say 'built', I was refering to bolt on's really. Power Plus intake, Holley 750 cfm, hypereutectics to forged pistons, smaller pulleys, and extremely minor porting of the heads. I plan to have it bored and stroked and put some headers on it. Last resort is aluminum heads, but they are very expensive.
The difference between the 5.0 HO and a 5.0 is 75 horsepower, so yeah there is a big difference. Im reffering to the last run of 5.0 that was out.
03-10-2003, 07:44 PM
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='Mar 10 2003, 04:56 PM
I wasnt talking to you, I was talking to 1revvin7.
The difference between the 5.0 HO and a 5.0 is 75 horsepower, so yeah there is a big difference. Im reffering to the last run of 5.0 that was out.
The difference between the 5.0 HO and a 5.0 is 75 horsepower, so yeah there is a big difference. Im reffering to the last run of 5.0 that was out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)