Did Steering Mod
The drawing is kinda misleading, as your steering rack travel from left to right doesn't change.
Sure, the ball joint moves, but you're still limited by the steering rack travel which doesn't change.
Hmmm...I guess this is something we just have to mess around with.
We're correctly rewelding the tie rod end connection at the hub to get the larger angles.
-Ted
Sure, the ball joint moves, but you're still limited by the steering rack travel which doesn't change.
Hmmm...I guess this is something we just have to mess around with.
We're correctly rewelding the tie rod end connection at the hub to get the larger angles.
-Ted
Originally Posted by RETed' date='Apr 2 2004, 08:25 PM
The drawing is kinda misleading, as your steering rack travel from left to right doesn't change.
Sure, the ball joint moves, but you're still limited by the steering rack travel which doesn't change.
Hmmm...I guess this is something we just have to mess around with.
We're correctly rewelding the tie rod end connection at the hub to get the larger angles.
-Ted
Sure, the ball joint moves, but you're still limited by the steering rack travel which doesn't change.
Hmmm...I guess this is something we just have to mess around with.
We're correctly rewelding the tie rod end connection at the hub to get the larger angles.
-Ted
Mark
Originally Posted by RETed' date='Apr 2 2004, 11:25 AM
The drawing is kinda misleading, as your steering rack travel from left to right doesn't change.
Sure, the ball joint moves, but you're still limited by the steering rack travel which doesn't change.
Hmmm...I guess this is something we just have to mess around with.
We're correctly rewelding the tie rod end connection at the hub to get the larger angles.
-Ted
Sure, the ball joint moves, but you're still limited by the steering rack travel which doesn't change.
Hmmm...I guess this is something we just have to mess around with.
We're correctly rewelding the tie rod end connection at the hub to get the larger angles.
-Ted
As far as I can tell, the spacers move each of the inner bumpstops outwards on the rack itself. Thus, instead of the rack being able to give one foot of travel between hitting each side's bumpstop, it can now travel 12.5". Thnik of adding a shorter bumpstop onto the stock shock absorbers... the ride height would still be the same, it would just be able to move up that much farther before it bottomed out.
This should have no affect on wheel alignment; it should only affect total rack travel length.
Am I on the right path here?
What it looks like they ARE doing is giving the rack more travel...
Or are we getting confused on terminology?
The steering wheel is still about 2.5 turns lock-to-lock.
You're not cutting extra teeth into the rack, so you're really not getting more travel.
the spacers don't change the total length between the two tie rods... IE: if the the total width between each ball joint is 70 inches before, it will be 70 inches after.
As far as I can tell, the spacers move each of the inner bumpstops outwards on the rack itself. Thus, instead of the rack being able to give one foot of travel between hitting each side's bumpstop, it can now travel 12.5". Thnik of adding a shorter bumpstop onto the stock shock absorbers... the ride height would still be the same, it would just be able to move up that much farther before it bottomed out.
If we take your shock analogy...
If you "shimmed" the shock downward, the shock travel is still the same - you just slid everything downward.
This should have no affect on wheel alignment; it should only affect total rack travel length.
-Ted


