my brain cannot make the decision.......
08-24-2002, 05:04 PM
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: KAOH
Posts: 597
all opinions considered ,very well considered, dacs more than others, t2's wont last as long as a honda would,espeacially if your running high boost, my mom had a 88 accord and it lasted almost 300,000 miles.anyways thanks for the replies,piece
08-24-2002, 07:30 PM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
I almost bought one of those cars, 
, then the 7 was the other option, well lets just say i didn't think twice after driving my car. That is way too much $$$ IMO. Get a TII for like 4k, spend 2k on a different econ bin honda for good reliable daily driver, thats what i would do.
08-25-2002, 04:23 AM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 946
The Del Sol's are prone to leaky tops and the little auxillary headlights burn out frequently on early models. Its the closest thing to a lemon that Honda ever made. I'd stay away from it, especially since its kind of a chick car.
08-25-2002, 07:23 AM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: transylvania
Posts: 3,620
Originally Posted by 89 Rag' date='Aug 24 2002, 05:17 PM
A Del Sol....err....a Honda Del Sol to replace an RX-7???
Del Sol Honda
That car is a shitbox, the ONLY honda I would remotely consider
would be the S2000 and I would still keep the 7, RWD is a necessity.
FWD automobiles are similar to old folks having sex; slow and sloppy.
That car is a shitbox, the ONLY honda I would remotely consider
would be the S2000 and I would still keep the 7, RWD is a necessity.
FWD automobiles are similar to old folks having sex; slow and sloppy.
08-25-2002, 08:56 AM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Originally Posted by bigtime1148' date='Aug 25 2002, 08:23 AM
[quote name='89 Rag' date='Aug 24 2002, 05:17 PM']A Del Sol....err....a Honda Del Sol to replace an RX-7???
Del Sol Honda
That car is a shitbox, the ONLY honda I would remotely consider
would be the S2000 and I would still keep the 7, RWD is a necessity.
FWD automobiles are similar to old folks having sex; slow and sloppy.
That car is a shitbox, the ONLY honda I would remotely consider
would be the S2000 and I would still keep the 7, RWD is a necessity.
FWD automobiles are similar to old folks having sex; slow and sloppy.
well since we are in US that would be an Acura. BUt $75,000 for one of those???? only like what 285hp? get a Viper for that cost.
08-25-2002, 05:55 PM
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: KAOH
Posts: 597
well they do have a double wishbone suspension in the front and rear which is superior to the mcphearson style like a second gen, i know the 3rd gen rx7 has double wishbone suspension front and rear to, have you ever done 150? but like i said all opinions are pprciate, im not trying to start any flames keep em coming :bigok:
08-25-2002, 06:32 PM
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 946
Originally Posted by sleeperRX7' date='Aug 25 2002, 04:55 PM
well they do have a double wishbone suspension in the front and rear which is superior to the mcphearson style like a second gen, i know the 3rd gen rx7 has double wishbone suspension front and rear to, have you ever done 150? but like i said all opinions are pprciate, im not trying to start any flames keep em coming :bigok: