RX-8 Discussion Discussion on Mazda's newest rotary powered vehicle.

Test Drove Rx-8 Today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2003 | 06:11 PM
  #1  
pengaru's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,930
From: IL
Default

Clutch was soft and slipped alot, tires didnt seem to stick very well, did a small burnout and experienced what almost seemed like wheelhop (traction control turned off). Seemed to exhibit alot of body roll, and took longer to reach 110 than my FC did before I tore it down on a very familiar stretch of road. I found this quite disappointing considering it's new, rated at higher output, has a much higher redline, and a 6 speed transmission. There was never any point where it felt like it was accelerating quickly throughout the rev range, the power was very linear and smooth, but too low. I suspect the dyno results people are getting are accurate because this did not feel like a 247HP vehicle at all. The best thing about the car was it being new. The car I looked at in the showroom had the spare tire included (nearly a $400 option) and it takes up a large amount of the already hurting trunk space, there is no recess for it to hide away into, it is literally in the trunk covered with some vinyl jacket.



Not worth the ~$30 price if you ask me.
Old Aug 21, 2003 | 06:19 PM
  #2  
Joe Flo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,142
From: Houston Texas
Default

They called me out to the dealer. My friend asked if I wanted to give it a spin. I wouldn't be suprised if they let me take it home like they did with the MS protege. I'm just not sure if it is worth the trip. They are nice cars to look at though!
Old Aug 21, 2003 | 06:31 PM
  #3  
pengaru's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,930
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Flo' date='Aug 21 2003, 11:19 PM
They called me out to the dealer. My friend asked if I wanted to give it a spin. I wouldn't be suprised if they let me take it home like they did with the MS protege. I'm just not sure if it is worth the trip. They are nice cars to look at though!
the paint wasnt even that nice they had a yellow one in the showroom that had orange peel all over, and when I popped the hood and trunk the paint on the engine bay and underside of the trunk / jamb of trunk is all a different shade of yellow vs. the exterior color, like it has no clear on it or something. It looked kindof ghetto in this respect, similar result as if I had repainted my car in my garage the original color, without trying to get it in the jambs and firewall/engine bay etc.



The placement of the car battery and windshield washer fluid bottle was wierd to me also, the washer bottle was by the firewall and the battery further forward in the car, in front of the front axle line.. why wouldnt yo u swap these two when designing a car that is supposedly so well balanced and great handling? Then theres the steel jack... the car is confused IMO.
Old Aug 21, 2003 | 06:56 PM
  #4  
Joe Flo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,142
From: Houston Texas
Default

The placement of the car battery and windshield washer fluid bottle was wierd to me also, the washer bottle was by the firewall and the battery further forward in the car, in front of the front axle line.. why wouldnt yo u swap these two when designing a car that is supposedly so well balanced and great handling? Then theres the steel jack... the car is confused IMO.


I didn't like that either!! It made me feel like Mazda was saying "stay the hell away from this **** cause your just gonna make things worse"



The plastic cover over the engine was the worst thing I have ever seen. It was made from the same plastic as my rubbermaid trashcan
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #5  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

wow..... i am confused how did the magazine tests get such good times if everyone says they are slow!
Old Aug 25, 2003 | 07:19 PM
  #6  
Leprechaun's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 11
Default

I also test drove it and was disappointed. WAY underpowered. And also overpriced. $31k is just too much. It is a nice car, the ride was nice and smooth, the engine and wind were quiet, but if it was a smooth, quiet ride I was after, there are many better cars for that out there. This was billed as a sports car, and it just doesn't feel like one, and has almost no punch until you get to like 6000 rpms. Disappointing for a $31k car. If the Rx-8 was loaded at $21k, then I'd be singing its praises...
Old Aug 25, 2003 | 09:32 PM
  #7  
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,725
From: La Plata, Maryland
Default

Well maybe the way to go ona RX-8 is to by a base model and rip out the rensis and drop in a 20b or a 13b-rew.

Then gets some coilovers and such..
Old Aug 27, 2003 | 03:53 PM
  #8  
DRFT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 126
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by vosko' date='Aug 22 2003, 07:55 AM
wow..... i am confused how did the magazine tests get such good times if everyone says they are slow!
The car is quick on turning and overall you just have to keep it reving high...

I test drove one yesterday and learned that for my self...i was very impreased with the way it entered corners..
Old Aug 27, 2003 | 07:42 PM
  #9  
gagamazda's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38
Default

I wonder if I can drop that 6 speed in my TII?
Old Sep 27, 2003 | 02:09 PM
  #10  
Triniwarrior31's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 356
Default

I drove my fiends 8 with the gt package, I wouldnt say the car was slow, it actually felt pretty quick if you ask me, remember the car isnt turbocharged, and the whole issue about waiting for 6000 rpm, what do you expect thats how rotarys are.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdm12a
3rd Generation Specific
12
Apr 2, 2007 11:48 PM
FrestyleFC3S
Test Forum
6
Aug 11, 2003 03:04 AM
Rotaryman88
Insert BS here
1
Nov 3, 2002 02:52 PM
Rotaryman88
Insert BS here
0
Feb 22, 2002 07:46 PM
vosko
Test Forum
0
Jan 7, 2002 12:31 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.