Rx-8 Rumors
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Originally Posted by GoRacer' date='Jul 31 2003, 08:07 PM
I saw one at the dealer. he told me to come back on sat and i can push it on the closed business streets 
He gave me his rumor of a twin turbo setup for the Mazdaspeed one. I should visit Zeil Motorsports and find out if its true sisnce they did the turbo Protoge. I would think a supercharger makes more sense, since it won't need an intercooler with low boost and it will help low end.
Anyhow Panspeed made a turbo RX-8 about a year ago! I beleive it's about 550PS and I posted a link for it on the RX-8 forum, so it can be done.
He gave me his rumor of a twin turbo setup for the Mazdaspeed one. I should visit Zeil Motorsports and find out if its true sisnce they did the turbo Protoge. I would think a supercharger makes more sense, since it won't need an intercooler with low boost and it will help low end.
Anyhow Panspeed made a turbo RX-8 about a year ago! I beleive it's about 550PS and I posted a link for it on the RX-8 forum, so it can be done.
mike
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 124
From: Pensacola, FL
Originally Posted by Munch' date='Munch pistons for lunch,Aug 18 2003, 02:39 AM
superchargers take more power to get going then turbos
But, in a car that already has pleny of HP and no torque I think a SC would make more sense. You can always change pulleys and run 10 or 11 lbs out of a SC if desired.. but I think 6 or 7 lbs on stock pulleys and 200 lb/ft of torque is a better idea.
This debate almost mirros the S2000 debate: SC or turbo? Hell the two cas even have almost identical power specs.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 787
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by kkw4p' date='Aug 18 2003, 11:19 AM
A good SC only takes 1/2 HP to turn. A good turbo doesn't require any.
But, in a car that already has pleny of HP and no torque I think a SC would make more sense. You can always change pulleys and run 10 or 11 lbs out of a SC if desired.. but I think 6 or 7 lbs on stock pulleys and 200 lb/ft of torque is a better idea.
This debate almost mirros the S2000 debate: SC or turbo? Hell the two cas even have almost identical power specs.
But, in a car that already has pleny of HP and no torque I think a SC would make more sense. You can always change pulleys and run 10 or 11 lbs out of a SC if desired.. but I think 6 or 7 lbs on stock pulleys and 200 lb/ft of torque is a better idea.
This debate almost mirros the S2000 debate: SC or turbo? Hell the two cas even have almost identical power specs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
