Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

na rotars in t2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:37 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wanglerrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: st. louis missouri
Posts: 125
Default

just wondering if anyone has built a 13bt(S5) useing S5 NA rotars. If so how did it run? i assume you would just have to keep the boost low?
wanglerrx7 is offline  
Old 03-03-2010, 02:05 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Liborek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Default

Originally Posted by wanglerrx7
just wondering if anyone has built a 13bt(S5) useing S5 NA rotars. If so how did it run? i assume you would just have to keep the boost low?


Most RX-8 guys are boosting about 10 PSI on 10:1 compression, but also they are getting 330+ whp. If you consider that some people were reliably boosting over 20 PSI with 9:1 on pump gas(just over 500 whp), I donīt see any reason why you shouldnīt run resonable boost with 9.7:1 CR rotors. Just run less advance - less timing is always good - even when you loss a bit of power. Higher EGTs just mean that engine isnīt stressed with useless heat and pressure spike around TDC.



Most people will warn you about much smaller room for error but hey, strong enough detonation/preignition will destroy certain parts of engine no matter compression ratio...
Liborek is offline  
Old 03-04-2010, 07:24 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wanglerrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: st. louis missouri
Posts: 125
Default

Originally Posted by Liborek
Most RX-8 guys are boosting about 10 PSI on 10:1 compression, but also they are getting 330+ whp. If you consider that some people were reliably boosting over 20 PSI with 9:1 on pump gas(just over 500 whp), I donīt see any reason why you shouldnīt run resonable boost with 9.7:1 CR rotors. Just run less advance - less timing is always good - even when you loss a bit of power. Higher EGTs just mean that engine isnīt stressed with useless heat and pressure spike around TDC.



Most people will warn you about much smaller room for error but hey, strong enough detonation/preignition will destroy certain parts of engine no matter compression ratio...


yeah i kinda figured. i just have both turbo rotars and a set of NA rotars so i was just kicking ideas around in my head. i think im just gonna go with the turbo rotors.
wanglerrx7 is offline  
Old 03-04-2010, 09:02 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Maxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 564
Default

Always use the lowest comp rotor you can with boost...
Maxt is offline  
Old 03-13-2010, 01:32 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

Originally Posted by Maxt
Always use the lowest comp rotor you can with boost...


agreed. here in CA, we have really poor fuel quality. higher compression = such a compromised tune that you'd be lucky it runs, if it does it'll be down on power VS the stock rotors
j9fd3s is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PowerBound
RX-8 Discussion
1
05-21-2015 12:32 AM
Ricer240sx
Insert BS here
10
12-13-2004 10:33 AM
1Revvin7
2nd Generation Specific
3
12-16-2001 10:49 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: na rotars in t2



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.