NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum

NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum (https://www.nopistons.com/)
-   Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps (https://www.nopistons.com/rotary-engine-building-porting-swaps-55/)
-   -   na rotars in t2 (https://www.nopistons.com/rotary-engine-building-porting-swaps-55/na-rotars-t2-73893/)

wanglerrx7 03-02-2010 10:37 PM

just wondering if anyone has built a 13bt(S5) useing S5 NA rotars. If so how did it run? i assume you would just have to keep the boost low?

Liborek 03-03-2010 02:05 PM


Originally Posted by wanglerrx7 (Post 838999)
just wondering if anyone has built a 13bt(S5) useing S5 NA rotars. If so how did it run? i assume you would just have to keep the boost low?



Most RX-8 guys are boosting about 10 PSI on 10:1 compression, but also they are getting 330+ whp. If you consider that some people were reliably boosting over 20 PSI with 9:1 on pump gas(just over 500 whp), I donīt see any reason why you shouldnīt run resonable boost with 9.7:1 CR rotors. Just run less advance - less timing is always good - even when you loss a bit of power. Higher EGTs just mean that engine isnīt stressed with useless heat and pressure spike around TDC.



Most people will warn you about much smaller room for error but hey, strong enough detonation/preignition will destroy certain parts of engine no matter compression ratio...

wanglerrx7 03-04-2010 07:24 PM


Originally Posted by Liborek (Post 839009)
Most RX-8 guys are boosting about 10 PSI on 10:1 compression, but also they are getting 330+ whp. If you consider that some people were reliably boosting over 20 PSI with 9:1 on pump gas(just over 500 whp), I donīt see any reason why you shouldnīt run resonable boost with 9.7:1 CR rotors. Just run less advance - less timing is always good - even when you loss a bit of power. Higher EGTs just mean that engine isnīt stressed with useless heat and pressure spike around TDC.



Most people will warn you about much smaller room for error but hey, strong enough detonation/preignition will destroy certain parts of engine no matter compression ratio...



yeah i kinda figured. i just have both turbo rotars and a set of NA rotars so i was just kicking ideas around in my head. i think im just gonna go with the turbo rotors.

Maxt 03-04-2010 09:02 PM

Always use the lowest comp rotor you can with boost...

j9fd3s 03-13-2010 01:32 PM


Originally Posted by Maxt (Post 839078)
Always use the lowest comp rotor you can with boost...



agreed. here in CA, we have really poor fuel quality. higher compression = such a compromised tune that you'd be lucky it runs, if it does it'll be down on power VS the stock rotors


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands