my portng idea...
06-22-2007, 10:31 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kissimmee FL.
Posts: 1,579
so its a mixture between a half bridge and full bridge...
the darker the blue, the deeper the port is. the darkest blue (the colour in the stock port) is the only place where the bridge gos all the way through the housing. the lighter it gets, the more its just like a "scratch" kinda like a tube slide. so its sucking air from the very begining of the bridge but, very slightly. gradually pulling air through the "slide" until it reaches bridge port status where it basically is a little shorter than a half bridge.
this idea is for a 13b-rew with a t-60-1 turbo. and will be tuned with an apex-i FC by Pettit Racing.....
opinions, ideas???
[attachment=42270:attachment]
(excuse the art work)
the darker the blue, the deeper the port is. the darkest blue (the colour in the stock port) is the only place where the bridge gos all the way through the housing. the lighter it gets, the more its just like a "scratch" kinda like a tube slide. so its sucking air from the very begining of the bridge but, very slightly. gradually pulling air through the "slide" until it reaches bridge port status where it basically is a little shorter than a half bridge.
this idea is for a 13b-rew with a t-60-1 turbo. and will be tuned with an apex-i FC by Pettit Racing.....
opinions, ideas???
[attachment=42270:attachment]
(excuse the art work)
06-22-2007, 11:33 AM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
what are you trying to acomplish?
my uneducated opinion, is that you're getting all the overlap/port size without actually having the flow, so it would just act like a bridgeport without making the power.
my uneducated opinion, is that you're getting all the overlap/port size without actually having the flow, so it would just act like a bridgeport without making the power.
06-22-2007, 11:45 AM
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kissimmee FL.
Posts: 1,579
im not that educated on porting either. im just thinking that in some way, letting more air in little by little would create a nice vacuum to suck in air faster and gradually build up.
06-23-2007, 09:10 AM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greenville / Sanford, NC
Posts: 222
Maybe you're going for a smoother power curve or something?
In theory it seems like a good idea but I think that the differences are negligible. If I understand it correctly, the regular port would, in essence, create the same effect because the air would still flow over the path of least resistance; it's not like a liquid that would fall down and create any sort of turbulence in this case. The air probably doesn't realize the gap that's there that you're trying to correct because it never gets caught in there.
In theory it seems like a good idea but I think that the differences are negligible. If I understand it correctly, the regular port would, in essence, create the same effect because the air would still flow over the path of least resistance; it's not like a liquid that would fall down and create any sort of turbulence in this case. The air probably doesn't realize the gap that's there that you're trying to correct because it never gets caught in there.
06-23-2007, 01:34 PM
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kissimmee FL.
Posts: 1,579
Originally Posted by j0rd4n' post='875941' date='Jun 23 2007, 07:10 AM
Maybe you're going for a smoother power curve or something?
In theory it seems like a good idea but I think that the differences are negligible. If I understand it correctly, the regular port would, in essence, create the same effect because the air would still flow over the path of least resistance; it's not like a liquid that would fall down and create any sort of turbulence in this case. The air probably doesn't realize the gap that's there that you're trying to correct because it never gets caught in there.
yes...the smooth power band is exctly what i built this idea around. this will be a street driven car. maybe a regular half bridge will do. i just am tired of seeing every rx7 with the same old bridge and half bridge port. and the ocassional PP. i wanna go to Austraila. you have to see some of there porting ideas and techniques.
06-25-2007, 10:29 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greenville / Sanford, NC
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by rotaryinspired' post='876227' date='Jun 25 2007, 07:32 PM
Go with what is proven unless you have tons of money to experiment and replace side housings when you dont like the results.
Agreed, very good insight...there's a lot of stuff that looks good on paper, but it always takes $$ to experiment
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)