Cosmo vs 13bt
02-02-2008, 06:54 AM
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
After measuring, and compensating for the angle of the RE runner. The RE is only 20% larger than the TII when combining the pri and sec ports on both to get a total area.
The taper in the RE runners is a big contributor to the actual size and is pretty much what C.Ludwig is saying. And the REW must be real close to the TII.
The taper in the RE runners is a big contributor to the actual size and is pretty much what C.Ludwig is saying. And the REW must be real close to the TII.
02-07-2008, 11:33 AM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
the cosmo intake runners are larger diameter than the t2's, at least they are at the gasket ends of the manifold.
i dont quite get it, the cosmo is the low end heavy car automatic engine, and its got smaller primary port openings, and bigger runners
i dont quite get it, the cosmo is the low end heavy car automatic engine, and its got smaller primary port openings, and bigger runners
02-08-2008, 08:46 PM
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='893837' date='Feb 7 2008, 12:33 PM
the cosmo intake runners are larger diameter than the t2's, at least they are at the gasket ends of the manifold.
i dont quite get it, the cosmo is the low end heavy car automatic engine, and its got smaller primary port openings, and bigger runners
i dont quite get it, the cosmo is the low end heavy car automatic engine, and its got smaller primary port openings, and bigger runners
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)