Cosmo vs 13bt
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,420
From: Boston Ma.
After measuring, and compensating for the angle of the RE runner. The RE is only 20% larger than the TII when combining the pri and sec ports on both to get a total area.
The taper in the RE runners is a big contributor to the actual size and is pretty much what C.Ludwig is saying. And the REW must be real close to the TII.
The taper in the RE runners is a big contributor to the actual size and is pretty much what C.Ludwig is saying. And the REW must be real close to the TII.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
the cosmo intake runners are larger diameter than the t2's, at least they are at the gasket ends of the manifold.
i dont quite get it, the cosmo is the low end heavy car automatic engine, and its got smaller primary port openings, and bigger runners
i dont quite get it, the cosmo is the low end heavy car automatic engine, and its got smaller primary port openings, and bigger runners
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,420
From: Boston Ma.
Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='893837' date='Feb 7 2008, 12:33 PM
the cosmo intake runners are larger diameter than the t2's, at least they are at the gasket ends of the manifold.
i dont quite get it, the cosmo is the low end heavy car automatic engine, and its got smaller primary port openings, and bigger runners
i dont quite get it, the cosmo is the low end heavy car automatic engine, and its got smaller primary port openings, and bigger runners
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)