Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

74 Rx-4 13b Rotors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 02:40 AM
  #1  
R.P.M.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 219
From: Kitchener Ont Canada
Default

I have a pair of rotors from a 74 RX-4 13B and can't find much in the line of specs for them, like how much they weigh, compression ratio etc...

I do know that they come stock with 3mm apex grooves and I am wondering if they would be any good for a PP engine build?

It also looks like the side seals are thicker? Are these still available through Mazda? or am I screwed?



Would the irons from this motor be any good for making power (do they flow good)? I read in that book "How to modify your Mazda" that the 74 13B's had the largest stock ports of any rotary up until 1990? They don't look any bigger than stock T2 ports.
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 03:42 AM
  #2  
HeffSpooled's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 452
From: Rainy Seattle
Default

The one thing I'm pretty sure of is that they, the irons, aren't nitrided and wear is more of an issue.



And the c/r s/b 9.2:1. http://www.monito.com/wankel/engines.html#Mazda



Here's some info. from a couple of old 4port 13B rotors I've got lying around.



#1 - "A", "1757", ~11lbs

#2 - "B", "1757", ~11.5lbs



3mm ?pc. apex seals and it looks like the side seals are real close to 0.04"(1.02mm).



btw both rotors came out of the same engine.
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #3  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

those rotors use the same side seals as every 68-85 motor. 12lbs and 9.2 compression, isnt really the hot ticket
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 11:51 PM
  #4  
R.P.M.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 219
From: Kitchener Ont Canada
Default

So not much good for perfromance application eh?



Well thanks for the info!
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 12:10 AM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by R.P.M.' date='Feb 6 2005, 09:51 PM
So not much good for perfromance application eh?



Well thanks for the info!



nothing wrong with em, but either the s4 or s5 rotors are lighter and have higher compression
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 03:53 AM
  #6  
HeffSpooled's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 452
From: Rainy Seattle
Default

I find it interesting that half a pound is an acceptable variance between rotors.



Should something like this bother the **** retentive when building an engine? Would the bearings last noticibly longer if they were the same letter series?
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 12:51 AM
  #7  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,284
Default

I just had to replace C rotor with a B. The C was unuseable. Now the engine has a B and a C. I would have been in trouble had they been A and C.
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 12:54 AM
  #8  
bcrx7's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 48
Default

Yeah they will be too heavy for PP's higher RPM
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
onereven7
Rotary Engine Building and Porting FAQ Section
1
Jul 19, 2005 08:09 PM
defprun
1st Generation Specific
1
May 1, 2004 02:47 PM
1Revvin7
RX-7 & RX-8 Parts For Sale & Wanted
3
Aug 19, 2003 11:54 AM
treceb
Engine Swaps
4
Jun 20, 2002 09:18 AM
sleeperRX7
Engine Swaps
2
Mar 20, 2002 12:52 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 PM.