2 New Kills, Nothing Spectacular
#22
ok yeah. and when you take the engine out what are you left with??? your point is completely irrelevant. and who are you to say that he wasnt going to the performance shop anyways? tancred was, so could the integ.
#23
If your car sounds like you strapped a coffee can full of marbles to your muffler - You might be a ricer...
If your FWD car has a wing that is larger than most small air craft - You might be a ricer...
If your wing is so large that birds are nested in it every morning - You might be a ricer...
If you think chrome "euro" tail lights add performance - You might be a ricer...
If you have decals on your car that most Japanese racers don't - You might be a ricer...
If you can't race uphill - You might be a ricer...
Thank you everyone... I'll be here all week.
If your FWD car has a wing that is larger than most small air craft - You might be a ricer...
If your wing is so large that birds are nested in it every morning - You might be a ricer...
If you think chrome "euro" tail lights add performance - You might be a ricer...
If you have decals on your car that most Japanese racers don't - You might be a ricer...
If you can't race uphill - You might be a ricer...
Thank you everyone... I'll be here all week.
#24
Originally Posted by Eric Happy Meal' date='Dec 22 2003, 04:51 PM
ok yeah. and when you take the engine out what are you left with??? your point is completely irrelevant. and who are you to say that he wasnt going to the performance shop anyways? tancred was, so could the integ.
#25
Originally Posted by 4RotorRocket' date='Dec 22 2003, 06:41 PM
omg lmfao "lets bash on 4RR time"
Im suprised knowone metioned my T66 thread where I said I may use a 50 shot for spool up. What makes a nitrous car so different from a turbo car is when you take that bottle away from the nitrous car...their left with nothing,no power.When your in a nitrous powered car you only get the max hp out of the car when you click the ***** juice.In a turbo car you can travel through your hp range...boost.I believe in bolt ons,Supercharging and Turbocharging not injection of the ***** juice lmfao.
Im suprised knowone metioned my T66 thread where I said I may use a 50 shot for spool up. What makes a nitrous car so different from a turbo car is when you take that bottle away from the nitrous car...their left with nothing,no power.When your in a nitrous powered car you only get the max hp out of the car when you click the ***** juice.In a turbo car you can travel through your hp range...boost.I believe in bolt ons,Supercharging and Turbocharging not injection of the ***** juice lmfao.
I tell ya, that F&F movie really fucked the car world up... All these modifications are similar (so to speak) yet because one is used in a stupid ******* movie, everybody has to back up their pride by bashing it...
Whatever...
#27
Originally Posted by 9BASE3' date='Dec 22 2003, 05:13 PM
This is one of the most confusing things I have EVER read. Why "*****" juice? The MOTOR is still making the power.. It's not the bottle, the turbo or the charger that gets read on the dyno. IT'S the HORSEPOWER. HORSEPOWER comes from the MOTOR. No matter how you look at it, regardless of what form of induction the car receives, it is still the MOTOR that makes the HP. To be honest... Nitrous is LESS of a cheat if you ask me. It's not much more than really efficient AIR. Cold and dense... Turbos take the exhaust pulses to spin a wheel that spins yet another wheel forcing air through the motor... Sounds more of an aiding device to me than nitrous.
I tell ya, that F&F movie really fucked the car world up... All these modifications are similar (so to speak) yet because one is used in a stupid ******* movie, everybody has to back up their pride by bashing it...
Whatever...
I tell ya, that F&F movie really fucked the car world up... All these modifications are similar (so to speak) yet because one is used in a stupid ******* movie, everybody has to back up their pride by bashing it...
Whatever...
I tell ya,my opinion isn't my view over no ghey F&F film buddy.Its from actual real life experience.Street racing was long before the F&F and as soon as someone here starts talking about street racing you automatically say their a F&F poser.
Whatever...
#28
Holy **** you guys! I dont check this for a day or so and you get all outta hand..
Anyways for those who were interested....
1988 T2
13b S4 Turbo Motor - Naturally...
Stock Turbo housing with ported and clipped garrett upgrade/rebuild
Racingbeat 3" Turboback exhaust
3" Custom TID
POS Starion Front Mount
Bonez Cone Filter
FCD Chip on ECU
MBC - Homemade Ball'n'spring
Walbro 255lph
No emissions
PS but no AC
Ported Internal Wastegate
4 x 680cc Injectors
S-AFC II
11.24 psi
Tokico Adj. Struts and Tokico Lowering Springs.... .78 inches!
255/17/7 - Yokos on the rear..... Is that the right format?
225/17/7 - Yokos in the front
LOL...I like 944 T's not a bad looking car, but still a cheap porche non the less....
Well, they are now...I dont know what they were originally....
Anyways for those who were interested....
1988 T2
13b S4 Turbo Motor - Naturally...
Stock Turbo housing with ported and clipped garrett upgrade/rebuild
Racingbeat 3" Turboback exhaust
3" Custom TID
POS Starion Front Mount
Bonez Cone Filter
FCD Chip on ECU
MBC - Homemade Ball'n'spring
Walbro 255lph
No emissions
PS but no AC
Ported Internal Wastegate
4 x 680cc Injectors
S-AFC II
11.24 psi
Tokico Adj. Struts and Tokico Lowering Springs.... .78 inches!
255/17/7 - Yokos on the rear..... Is that the right format?
225/17/7 - Yokos in the front
LOL...I like 944 T's not a bad looking car, but still a cheap porche non the less....
Well, they are now...I dont know what they were originally....
#30
Originally Posted by Jims5543' date='Dec 22 2003, 11:12 AM
Nice kills. Both those cars can be potent. Although the 944T would have been the one that I would be most nervous of. Its quick to begin with. Whereas the Integra, well, its a slow car that is just a little faster than quick once you strap on a turbo.
Nice Job.
Mods?
Nice Job.
Mods?