194rwhp Vs 400hp @ Fly
#14
Originally Posted by Leetheslacker' date='Mar 28 2004, 07:15 PM
wait, 14.7 from 400hp? How the **** does that work?
they are quite a heavy car... about 1750kgs or something... and the auto box is pretty pox.
it says 14.78sec @ 98MPH on the slip...
Holden has a HSV GTS which is the same engine and supposed same output but with a claimed 0-400m of 13.7 for the auto... but HSV is the special vehicle section of holden.
#17
Originally Posted by inark' date='Mar 28 2004, 08:13 PM
tried working that out myself...
they are quite a heavy car... about 1750kgs or something... and the auto box is pretty pox.
it says 14.78sec @ 98MPH on the slip...
Holden has a HSV GTS which is the same engine and supposed same output but with a claimed 0-400m of 13.7 for the auto... but HSV is the special vehicle section of holden.
they are quite a heavy car... about 1750kgs or something... and the auto box is pretty pox.
it says 14.78sec @ 98MPH on the slip...
Holden has a HSV GTS which is the same engine and supposed same output but with a claimed 0-400m of 13.7 for the auto... but HSV is the special vehicle section of holden.
But still Ford/Holden same ****.
#18
Originally Posted by inark' date='Mar 27 2004, 08:55 PM
had a drag at calder park raceway in melbourne against a 5.7litre V8 SS Automatic with a full exhaust and extractors which was putting out 300kw or 400HP to those who have no idea what a KW is
#20
Originally Posted by Leetheslacker' date='Mar 28 2004, 07:15 PM
wait, 14.7 from 400hp? How the **** does that work?
I think the guy was full of **** saying he was pushing 400rwhp. More likely 400FWHP which converts out to 325 rwhp with a 14.7 is still slow but a little easier to swallow with a bad driver.