Rotaries Permissable for F1 in the Future?
#11
I doubt that you can make the rotary powerfull enough to compete with the piston engines in F1 trim, unless you go turbo which is not allowed.
Even the three rotor in the Courage Mazda LMP2 car is insufficient compared to the competetion.
Even the three rotor in the Courage Mazda LMP2 car is insufficient compared to the competetion.
#12
Originally Posted by Kim' post='803367' date='Feb 22 2006, 06:35 AM
I doubt that you can make the rotary powerfull enough to compete with the piston engines in F1 trim, unless you go turbo which is not allowed.
Even the three rotor in the Courage Mazda LMP2 car is insufficient compared to the competetion.
I find it hard to believe that with a little development work, the rotary couldn't be made to compete with piston engines in F1. Displacement for displacement, the rotary could kick a piston's *** in the output department. Maybe not in fuel consumption, though.
#13
Originally Posted by 1988RedT2' post='803390' date='Feb 22 2006, 09:56 AM
I find it hard to believe that with a little development work, the rotary couldn't be made to compete with piston engines in F1. Displacement for displacement, the rotary could kick a piston's *** in the output department.
Maybe it could be more economical with the ren style exhaust port. I dont think Mazda ever used side exhaust ports in racing even to this day.
#14
Something people forget is how much time and money have gone into piston enignes. Compare a piston engine today with what was being produced 50 years ago. . .
In the current political state of the sport, they don't allow anything besides a V-10 (in the name of cost-cutting/savings). It will take a major shake-up to even consider allowing different configurations, let alone different engine types. Damn shame, though. I wonder how fast they could make a rotary turn?
In the current political state of the sport, they don't allow anything besides a V-10 (in the name of cost-cutting/savings). It will take a major shake-up to even consider allowing different configurations, let alone different engine types. Damn shame, though. I wonder how fast they could make a rotary turn?
#15
Originally Posted by Kim' post='803367' date='Feb 22 2006, 06:35 AM
I doubt that you can make the rotary powerfull enough to compete with the piston engines in F1 trim, unless you go turbo which is not allowed.
Even the three rotor in the Courage Mazda LMP2 car is insufficient compared to the competetion.
To me, "any motor" includes FI.
#16
Originally Posted by RONIN FC' post='803412' date='Feb 22 2006, 11:59 AM
With the F1 budget, I think so too.
Maybe it could be more economical with the ren style exhaust port. I dont think Mazda ever used side exhaust ports in racing even to this day.
Star Mazda uses RENESIS engines, right?
#17
Originally Posted by Dysfnctnl85' post='803437' date='Feb 22 2006, 01:38 PM
Star Mazda uses RENESIS engines, right?
I remember reading the "new" ALMS rotaries still bieng Peri exhaust port, and still bieng called "RENESIS based". So i dunno.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LUV94RX7
Single Turbo Discussion
12
11-24-2001 12:06 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)