Iraq
01-26-2003, 12:09 PM
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,550
Originally Posted by lane_change' date='Jan 24 2003, 05:15 PM
My dad is a retired officer from the Marine Corps and he got called a while back to see if he would be willing to go in case they needed him to. He of course said yes and is looking forward to it. So if they are calling up the reserves than I bet he had better start realizing that he may actually be going soon. I hope it is resolved swiftly and decisevly just like last time. But this time we need to actually get rid of Sadahm and his 2 fucked up sons. I wish everyone the best of luck in this endeavor. One of my best friends is in the Marines and he just got orders to Oki, I wonder if that has anything to do with Korea?
01-26-2003, 12:17 PM
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted by Dragon' date='Jan 26 2003, 12:06 PM
...pregnant women tied and nailed to telephone poles with their stomachs cut open and the unborn child hanging from their bodys by the umbilical cord...
FDOkinawa was sent over there last Monday, wish him luck...
FDOkinawa was sent over there last Monday, wish him luck...
Saw tons of places where they executed people... Like stood them up against a wall and sawed them in half with machine guns... Even cleaned up it was still gut wrenching...
Good luck to FDOkinawa! Hooah!
01-26-2003, 12:53 PM
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbia,MO
Posts: 656
Originally Posted by Dragon' date='Jan 26 2003, 10:09 AM
Have you buddy get with me when he gets here to Okinawa... my cell #090-7293-7691 we'll see what we can do about making him a rotary freak and try to keep him out of trouble or get him in to it... 
These are some awful stories, at least these new wars are not civic, they are 1 on 1. And not one army killing civilians. I wish everyone the best and hope that our technology helps keep our guys safe. We are only sending half as many troops to Iraq this time as during the Persian Gulf. And I believe 4 Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups. They assume it will a quick war with minimal casulties for us and a decisive victory. We just need the rest of the world to support us in the fight against terrorism once war begins. That will be th worst of it. That and trying to prevent Iraq from bombing Israel, which is one of the places that is in there reach to attack and one that we will defend even though the Isralie citizens dislike Americans as well. I have been there and we are not very liked by the Jewish citizens and we are almost hated by the Muslim citizens. The middle east is suck a mess, I don't know if it will ever end. Hopefully, some day.
01-26-2003, 07:38 PM
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
just want to toss in a bit of food for thought:
1) Not many countries have ever won a two-front war, it's rare to win one, and basically is how the **** regime was destroyed, attack from both sides and you split their numbers in half, it's common sense. THats what i see going on with N. Korea and the mid-east.
2) I think phins made the comment about war not being good for the economy, if you look back at evey war we've been involved in, during those wars our economy uplifted rather drasically, of course sometimes it would crash AFTER the war and we'd be hit with a depression... but during wars the economy, unexplicably, is VERY good. I still dont think an economy is worth a war though.
kevin.
1) Not many countries have ever won a two-front war, it's rare to win one, and basically is how the **** regime was destroyed, attack from both sides and you split their numbers in half, it's common sense. THats what i see going on with N. Korea and the mid-east.
2) I think phins made the comment about war not being good for the economy, if you look back at evey war we've been involved in, during those wars our economy uplifted rather drasically, of course sometimes it would crash AFTER the war and we'd be hit with a depression... but during wars the economy, unexplicably, is VERY good. I still dont think an economy is worth a war though.
kevin.
01-26-2003, 09:04 PM
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: transylvania
Posts: 3,620
Originally Posted by teknics' date='Jan 26 2003, 08:38 PM
just want to toss in a bit of food for thought:
1) Not many countries have ever won a two-front war, it's rare to win one, and basically is how the **** regime was destroyed, attack from both sides and you split their numbers in half, it's common sense. THats what i see going on with N. Korea and the mid-east.
2) I think phins made the comment about war not being good for the economy, if you look back at evey war we've been involved in, during those wars our economy uplifted rather drasically, of course sometimes it would crash AFTER the war and we'd be hit with a depression... but during wars the economy, unexplicably, is VERY good. I still dont think an economy is worth a war though.
kevin.
1) Not many countries have ever won a two-front war, it's rare to win one, and basically is how the **** regime was destroyed, attack from both sides and you split their numbers in half, it's common sense. THats what i see going on with N. Korea and the mid-east.
2) I think phins made the comment about war not being good for the economy, if you look back at evey war we've been involved in, during those wars our economy uplifted rather drasically, of course sometimes it would crash AFTER the war and we'd be hit with a depression... but during wars the economy, unexplicably, is VERY good. I still dont think an economy is worth a war though.
kevin.
01-26-2003, 10:08 PM
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
ya bigitme now that i think about it that's always the reason they gave.The government and such was in need of more materials and people to work the factories to build machinery and such therefore creating a widespread demand for jobs.....also explains why the economy falters after a war, cause once war is over all those jobs collapse instantly.
kevin
kevin
01-26-2003, 11:58 PM
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 2,930
Originally Posted by teknics' date='Jan 27 2003, 04:08 AM
ya bigitme now that i think about it that's always the reason they gave.The government and such was in need of more materials and people to work the factories to build machinery and such therefore creating a widespread demand for jobs.....also explains why the economy falters after a war, cause once war is over all those jobs collapse instantly.
kevin
kevin
01-27-2003, 09:31 AM
#49
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted by pengaru' date='Jan 26 2003, 11:58 PM
[quote name='teknics' date='Jan 27 2003, 04:08 AM'] ya bigitme now that i think about it that's always the reason they gave.The government and such was in need of more materials and people to work the factories to build machinery and such therefore creating a widespread demand for jobs.....also explains why the economy falters after a war, cause once war is over all those jobs collapse instantly.
kevin
kevin
Yup. That happened to me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)