dream vehicals,
01-16-2006, 12:33 PM
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Originally Posted by BrandonDrecksage' post='794417' date='Jan 16 2006, 07:19 AM
a new zo6...preferbly with some turbos and a lumpy *** idle and some wide *** slicks.
your transmaro only does 108 in the 1/4? are those things really heavy or something?
01-16-2006, 07:52 PM
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: A2, MI
Posts: 453
well, i have my plans for a project car, but most of the fun there is building it myself, not just having it appear. Otherwise, id trade it for a new FD, Koeniggsegg CCR, Spyker C8 Laviolette, Opel Speedster or Noble M14... well... anything more expensive than it, so at the very least i can buy it back and have a little extra $
01-17-2006, 05:26 PM
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: green brook, nj
Posts: 792
Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='794466' date='Jan 16 2006, 01:33 PM
your transmaro only does 108 in the 1/4? are those things really heavy or something?
3400 lbs roughly, but its basically stock..a lid and catback....how many other cars trap that in the same class or price range? evos and stis trap around 100-103...fds trap somewhere around 100 stock....whats so unimpressive about a 108 trap? and my car also had 65k on it with the original clutch. Not to mention I'm not the best driver with a 2.4 60ft...if i could get that down to a 1.8-2.0 that would be around a 12.5ish
01-17-2006, 06:48 PM
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Originally Posted by BrandonDrecksage' post='794714' date='Jan 17 2006, 03:26 PM
3400 lbs roughly, but its basically stock..a lid and catback....how many other cars trap that in the same class or price range? evos and stis trap around 100-103...fds trap somewhere around 100 stock....whats so unimpressive about a 108 trap? and my car also had 65k on it with the original clutch. Not to mention I'm not the best driver with a 2.4 60ft...if i could get that down to a 1.8-2.0 that would be around a 12.5ish
yeah, i thought all the acronyms were more power than that.
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/4601/hpcalc.html
354HP isnt bad at all
01-18-2006, 07:22 AM
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: green brook, nj
Posts: 792
Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='794729' date='Jan 17 2006, 07:48 PM
yeah, i thought all the acronyms were more power than that.
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/4601/hpcalc.html
354HP isnt bad at all
no..SS only really adds a suspension, some badges and then there are extras..like wheels, intake and exhaust...but with the intake and exahsut your looking at roughly 10-15 whp over stock. and most m6 ls1 cars dyno around 300-310 to the wheels.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)