ColinRX7

What's better. Let's hear it.



Carb of EFI, and don't rule out EMS with EFI. Don't limit yourself to comparison of stock ECU versus Carb. Think on a basic accuracy standpoint.



What's better?



I SAY EFI.

teknics

his name is DEAF PRUNE. why listen to a deaf wrinkly little carb loving piece of egg enema leftover?



kevin.

Eyxom

I'd have to say EFI, but my friend's Carb FC was very nice... I must admit.

ColinRX7

SO KEVNI LOVES EFI TOO

defprun

They are absolute no doubt, the absolute WIN when it comes to N/A performance in piston or otherwise powered vehicles and it is a perfectly viable solution, not too mention a cheap way to produce powear with a snail.

ColinRX7

EFI is just more accurate plain and simple.



Carbs are easier to tune and whatever, but they're big and dirty. Right? That's what me and defprun argue about like every other day.



I SAY EFI IS BETTER. IT'S A MORE ACCURATE WAY.

ColinRX7

Yeah but I'm not talking about how much it costs.



I'm saying take the same car, same engine, same everything, and tune it to perfection with a carb, and tune it to perfection with an EMS using EFI.



What one will get better more accurate results?

ColinRX7

Too late to edit because someone will quote me.



Allow me to clarify.



I meant take TWO of the same everything, just one perfectly tuned with a carb, one perfectly tuned with an EMS using EFI.

defprun

Asshat: ( )



You see carbs = win



EFI = teh not win



see!



proof.

ColinRX7

Yeah you lose sucker.