Bloody Microsoft!
05-04-2005, 10:17 PM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ummm, Oregon
Posts: 504
haha xp64 is ******* poiuntless at this stage, sure windows runs faster, woopdy ******* do. mine runs perfectly fine as it is right now, once they relase some actual usefull features for this i would think about doing it. but as far as running windows programs go... my computer runs solitare fine.
05-05-2005, 04:18 AM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 1,312
man, **** xp, **** ME, **** 98, use 2000 ....
I've been in the industry for about 10 years, and ive been through my share of OSes, and I always come back to win2k. I run xp on one of my machines here and its gay as hell. I hate it.... absolutly hate it.
As why get xp64, when MS just announced that longhorn is coming out next year? *shrug*
I've been in the industry for about 10 years, and ive been through my share of OSes, and I always come back to win2k. I run xp on one of my machines here and its gay as hell. I hate it.... absolutly hate it.
As why get xp64, when MS just announced that longhorn is coming out next year? *shrug*
05-06-2005, 05:01 AM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 1,312
i stand by my words of 2k. It uses NT as its base, which was far better than any of the others. Only ... 2k is better. 
And its still has dos fully intergrated, so you can break it down to the easiest levels if need be. I've gone through TONS of OSes in the past 8 years and I've trouble shooted and configured them all, and XP has to be the absolute worst. I hate it with every bone in my body.
And its still has dos fully intergrated, so you can break it down to the easiest levels if need be. I've gone through TONS of OSes in the past 8 years and I've trouble shooted and configured them all, and XP has to be the absolute worst. I hate it with every bone in my body.
