Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

anyone drive the rx8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 09:46 PM
  #31  
Sinful7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,985
From: Denver, CO
Default

Originally Posted by SilverSeven' post='788196' date='Dec 19 2005, 08:16 PM

Besides, for the same money as a new RX-8, you can get 00-01 M5. No-brainer what?!?!


I actually meant to ask you how the upkeep is on that beast of a car.. I was seriously considering an M5 until I heard there were some big-time, high dollar maintenance issues with it.
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:01 PM
  #32  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

Originally Posted by boxrs4sale' post='788200' date='Dec 19 2005, 10:32 PM

like an rx7 or 8 is any better


you have never had to buy any parts for a BMW I suppose
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:04 PM
  #33  
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 635
From: Orange County, NY
Default

I'd rather rock an IS250/300/350.
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:04 PM
  #34  
Sinful7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,985
From: Denver, CO
Default

From everything that I've seen the RX-8's performance is pretty much identical to or below it's major competitors, such as the 350Z, G35, Mustang GT, GTO, Crossfire, Eclipse, S2000, Z4 (note: these aren't necessarily the same specific class as the 8, just a very rough grouping of sports coupes). If you just look at the stats on paper, none of these cars particularly stand out from the others.


You know, that's a good point. The 8 is just about the same as the competitors.. which brings me to my (subjective) breakdown:

350Z - Wow, what a car.. sexy all over. Cheap interior, though. No glovebox (wtf). Good luck driving on frosty tarmac.

G35 - 40 grand is a tad out of the price range here.

Mustang GT - They're everywhere. They're porky.

GTO - That's one HELL of a car!! But it's a Pontiac.

Crossfire - again in the high 30's territory.. and with the decent (middle model) V6, it's pushing 40k quick.. Still only has two seats.. Sexy though!

Eclipse - They're pretty hot in a picture.. they look like a Supra and a 2G Eclipse boinked. Not sure about performance data, as I've never seriously considered any late model DSM. The EVO's are sweet.. Fast as hell, but that interior makes me want to not drive anywhere! Seriously! It's like a Jetta in there! Probably one of the mose uncomfortable performance-oriented cars I've ever driven.

S2000 - Convertible.. I just can't do the roadster. I'm not 40+, I'm not gay, I'm not a ricer.. 10k rpm redline is sweet.. so sweet.. But I do want to do more with a car than just drive around getting a sunburn.

Z4 - Remember when the Z3 came out? What about that car now.. Yeah.



Ultimately, putting my childish commentary on each model aside, there's really only two cars in the sports coupe segment that are price-exclusive competetors with the 8. Each having four seats, two (real) doors and the sports-coupe market segment, are the M3 and the G35 Coupe. Performance on both those cars is widely considered more than adequate.. And guess what? The 8 is just as fast on the road. And it's cheaper! So what if a stock, enthusiast prepared car pulls .04 g more than the 8. Get me a set of 18x10's and we'll try it again! It's not like I'm even getting close to the maximums on that highway offramp. Sure, there might be a car out there that goes a little faster through the slalom. There might be one that gets off the line a little quicker. How much are you willing to pay for that .04g, or that .2 sec 1/4 mile? Is there any value there? Probably not.
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:08 PM
  #35  
boxrs4sale's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 682
From: Delaware
Default

350z's don't have a glovebox?
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #36  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

last I checked G35s were in the $32k-$35k range



They also rank wayyyyyyy up there in reliability and kick serious *** in resale, you cannot compare that to a Mazda.
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #37  
boxrs4sale's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 682
From: Delaware
Default

you mean an rx8 isn't reliable.... *cough*
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:29 PM
  #38  
Sinful7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,985
From: Denver, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Rob x-7' post='788211' date='Dec 19 2005, 09:10 PM

last I checked G35s were in the $32k-$35k range



They also rank wayyyyyyy up there in reliability and kick serious *** in resale, you cannot compare that to a Mazda.
Huh, ain't that some ****? I coulda sworn they were pricey-er, but you're right - base 6MT's are $33k.. Now don't do optioning that sucker out..
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #39  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

last I checked was almost 3 years ago, when the RX8 was 31k, prices on the G35 were around 35k for a nice one, toping out at 38
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:54 PM
  #40  
BigTurbo74's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,315
Default

cool! a legit convo on other cars. does anybody have any facts on the latest and greatest flash for the 8? i agree with sinful in parts as well as silverseven especially the last bits. another thing i would like to add is the emissions output of the renesis. it may not be the sportiest engine ever made, but i think mazda has made reasonable leaps to make it more compliant as well as keeping it within the lower price ranges. i think i heard the 8 will be going under a refresh, i'm eager to see what they change...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.