Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

3dmark03 Benchmark

Old Apr 25, 2003 | 12:29 AM
  #1  
vosko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

my machine got 1899 hmm



www.3dmark.com
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 12:33 AM
  #2  
9BASE3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,331
From: Frederick MD
Default

Uh....
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 01:32 AM
  #3  
phinsup's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 24,416
From: Stuart, FL
Default

Yea what the hell? Where do you do anything LOL?
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 02:41 AM
  #4  
Nemesis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,535
From: ATX
Default

I dunno
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 08:23 AM
  #5  
drew's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,278
From: Columbia, MD
Default

you have an nvidia video card in that thing don't you? I've read a bunch of stuff that says that benchmark is geared towards ATI



I got 1475 on the 03 benchmark and 11500 on 01SE with:



Athlon 2800+ (barton core, 512K cache)

Asus MB with nForce2

1 GB DDR @ 400 dual channel

4 x 120GB WD (8MB cache) @ raid5 (Adaptec 2400A with 128MB cache)

nVidia Ti 4200 w 64MB



most of those becnhmarks in 3dmark03 looked like they weren't even using the card at all... 3-5 fps... bullshit...
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:11 AM
  #6  
9BASE3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,331
From: Frederick MD
Default

Originally Posted by drew' date='Apr 25 2003, 07:23 AM
I got 1475 on the 03 benchmark and 11500 on 01SE with:



Athlon 2800+ (barton core, 512K cache)

Asus MB with nForce2

1 GB DDR @ 400 dual channel

4 x 120GB WD (8MB cache) @ raid5 (Adaptec 2400A with 128MB cache)

nVidia Ti 4200 w 64MB



most of those becnhmarks in 3dmark03 looked like they weren't even using the card at all... 3-5 fps... bullshit...
Blah blah blah...





I got a few bags of grass... Multi-colored Uppers, Downers... Few sheets of blotter acid, few grams of coke.. pint of Raw Ether and a fifth of Vodka...











Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #7  
Geoffman72's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,234
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Not bad! I thought it funny that my machine benchmarked 486 exactly when I ran the test.
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:29 AM
  #8  
drew's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,278
From: Columbia, MD
Default

Originally Posted by 9BASE3' date='Apr 25 2003, 09:11 AM
[quote name='drew' date='Apr 25 2003, 07:23 AM']

I got 1475 on the 03 benchmark and 11500 on 01SE with:



Athlon 2800+ (barton core, 512K cache)

Asus MB with nForce2

1 GB DDR @ 400 dual channel

4 x 120GB WD (8MB cache) @ raid5 (Adaptec 2400A with 128MB cache)

nVidia Ti 4200 w 64MB



most of those becnhmarks in 3dmark03 looked like they weren't even using the card at all... 3-5 fps... bullshit...
Blah blah blah...





I got a few bags of grass... Multi-colored Uppers, Downers... Few sheets of blotter acid, few grams of coke.. pint of Raw Ether and a fifth of Vodka...











[/quote]

well that'll get the job done too...
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:31 AM
  #9  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

results
Attached Thumbnails 3dmark03 Benchmark-benchmark2.jpg  
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:42 AM
  #10  
Geoffman72's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,234
From: Rochester, NY
Default

I'm thinking 500mhz machine with 16mb 3D accelerator card?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.