Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

3dmark03 Benchmark

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2003, 12:29 AM
  #1  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 17,839
Default

my machine got 1899 hmm



www.3dmark.com
vosko is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 12:33 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
9BASE3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 6,331
Default

Uh....
9BASE3 is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 01:32 AM
  #3  
Administrator
 
phinsup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 24,416
Default

Yea what the hell? Where do you do anything LOL?
phinsup is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 02:41 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Nemesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,535
Default

I dunno
Nemesis is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 08:23 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,278
Default

you have an nvidia video card in that thing don't you? I've read a bunch of stuff that says that benchmark is geared towards ATI



I got 1475 on the 03 benchmark and 11500 on 01SE with:



Athlon 2800+ (barton core, 512K cache)

Asus MB with nForce2

1 GB DDR @ 400 dual channel

4 x 120GB WD (8MB cache) @ raid5 (Adaptec 2400A with 128MB cache)

nVidia Ti 4200 w 64MB



most of those becnhmarks in 3dmark03 looked like they weren't even using the card at all... 3-5 fps... bullshit...
drew is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:11 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
9BASE3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 6,331
Default

Originally Posted by drew' date='Apr 25 2003, 07:23 AM
I got 1475 on the 03 benchmark and 11500 on 01SE with:



Athlon 2800+ (barton core, 512K cache)

Asus MB with nForce2

1 GB DDR @ 400 dual channel

4 x 120GB WD (8MB cache) @ raid5 (Adaptec 2400A with 128MB cache)

nVidia Ti 4200 w 64MB



most of those becnhmarks in 3dmark03 looked like they weren't even using the card at all... 3-5 fps... bullshit...
Blah blah blah...





I got a few bags of grass... Multi-colored Uppers, Downers... Few sheets of blotter acid, few grams of coke.. pint of Raw Ether and a fifth of Vodka...











9BASE3 is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:17 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Geoffman72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,234
Default

Not bad! I thought it funny that my machine benchmarked 486 exactly when I ran the test.
Geoffman72 is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:29 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,278
Default

Originally Posted by 9BASE3' date='Apr 25 2003, 09:11 AM
[quote name='drew' date='Apr 25 2003, 07:23 AM']

I got 1475 on the 03 benchmark and 11500 on 01SE with:



Athlon 2800+ (barton core, 512K cache)

Asus MB with nForce2

1 GB DDR @ 400 dual channel

4 x 120GB WD (8MB cache) @ raid5 (Adaptec 2400A with 128MB cache)

nVidia Ti 4200 w 64MB



most of those becnhmarks in 3dmark03 looked like they weren't even using the card at all... 3-5 fps... bullshit...
Blah blah blah...





I got a few bags of grass... Multi-colored Uppers, Downers... Few sheets of blotter acid, few grams of coke.. pint of Raw Ether and a fifth of Vodka...











[/quote]

well that'll get the job done too...
drew is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:31 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

results
Attached Thumbnails 3dmark03 Benchmark-benchmark2.jpg  
teknics is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:42 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Geoffman72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,234
Default

I'm thinking 500mhz machine with 16mb 3D accelerator card?
Geoffman72 is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.