Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

3dmark03 Benchmark

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:43 AM
  #11  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

double post.

kevin.
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:43 AM
  #12  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

2.6Ghz, 512Mb DDR Ram, some crazy *** nvidia card ,whole bunch of free **** from Rockstar Games NY HQ, i used to work for them.



kevin.
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:51 AM
  #13  
Geoffman72's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,234
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Jesus, how did you get 1987 3Dmark01 points with that setup?
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:56 AM
  #14  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

i dunno, i havent looked inside the computer, all they told me was it's 2.6Ghz with 512 ddr ram. the rest they said i dont have to worry about. it was designed to make their games run as fast as possible. they said they designed the system around their development computers for GTA3 and GTA:VC and that it would run those games faster then other shelf-bought systems.



that test was in 1024x768x32 mode BTW.



my benchmark with my old homebuilt pc would probably be like 700, it was ***** till they sent me this one.



kevin.
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 10:03 AM
  #15  
Geoffman72's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,234
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Ah. Reason I asked is my XP1800/512 DDR/Radeon 8500LE 128mb rig pulled a best of 8900 marks in 3dmark01.





Also you usually run the tests with FSAA and AF disabled and use the default 3dmark settings for best scores I think.
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 10:05 AM
  #16  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Geoffman72' date='Apr 25 2003, 10:03 AM
Ah. Reason I asked is my XP1800/512 DDR/Radeon 8500LE 128mb rig pulled a best of 8900 marks in 3dmark01.





Also you usually run the tests with FSAA and AF disabled and use the default 3dmark settings for best scores I think.
oh well now the 3dmark thing wont even load up, and i just tried playing gta3 and it wont load the game due to card driver error. ******* program tossed up my system, time to listen to some hard rock so i dont break ****.



kevin.
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 10:34 AM
  #17  
vosko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by drew' date='Apr 25 2003, 09:23 AM
you have an nvidia video card in that thing don't you? I've read a bunch of stuff that says that benchmark is geared towards ATI



I got 1475 on the 03 benchmark and 11500 on 01SE with:



Athlon 2800+ (barton core, 512K cache)

Asus MB with nForce2

1 GB DDR @ 400 dual channel

4 x 120GB WD (8MB cache) @ raid5 (Adaptec 2400A with 128MB cache)

nVidia Ti 4200 w 64MB



most of those becnhmarks in 3dmark03 looked like they weren't even using the card at all... 3-5 fps... bullshit...
yeah i noticed ... i thought my computer was broken



i have a GF4 Ti 4600 ...



P4 3.06

512 DDR PC2700

WD 120GB 8MB 7200RPM

INTEL MB
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 10:36 AM
  #18  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

i vote that 3dmark sucks ***.



kevin.
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 10:50 AM
  #19  
vosko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

3dmark2k1 was pretty cool with the matrix scene
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 10:51 AM
  #20  
vosko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

maybe i'll try out a radeon 9800 pro and see what it benchmarks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 PM.