3rd Generation Specific Talk about 3rd gen RX-7's here.

99 Jdm Turbo's Efficacy Graph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2003, 11:59 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MazdaMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Merrick NY / St.John's Uni Jamacia, NY
Posts: 1,073
Default

hey im not sure how much boost i can get out of these turbos without compromising durability or efficacy. they are the 99's i know they made more than one set these are the ones that produced 285hp anyway anyone know where do get this graph. ive seen one for the older 93's but i cant find that one either. please heeelllppppp.



mike
MazdaMike is offline  
Old 03-29-2003, 12:00 PM
  #2  
Super Moderator
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 17,839
Default

15 psi max..... for efficiency reasons
vosko is offline  
Old 03-29-2003, 01:37 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: union, new jersey
Posts: 8,079
Default

post the one that you have for 93 spec turbos
FikseRxSeven is offline  
Old 03-30-2003, 11:50 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
rxtacy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 208
Default

15 psi max..... for efficiency reasons
you really think 15psi would be safe? that would scare me. would it be better to run non-seq at 15psi?
rxtacy is offline  
Old 03-30-2003, 11:59 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: union, new jersey
Posts: 8,079
Default

it should be better to run non sequential at high boost........ cuz on sequential, the first turbo spools up to max boost then spools the second one ..... on a non seq, the spool at the same time



at least thats my understanding of things........ someone please correct me if im wrong
FikseRxSeven is offline  
Old 03-30-2003, 03:00 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MazdaMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Merrick NY / St.John's Uni Jamacia, NY
Posts: 1,073
Default

yea it makes sense to go non sequential. but no one has these graphs.



i dont have the one for the 93's although i have seen it b4 on some web site or another.
MazdaMike is offline  
Old 03-30-2003, 11:10 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
twinturborx7pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Panama City Beach, Florida
Posts: 993
Default

eh i like non seq... more predictable boost... and if you see my engine bay, you'd understand 3 vacuum lines.
twinturborx7pete is offline  
Old 03-30-2003, 11:23 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: union, new jersey
Posts: 8,079
Default

Originally Posted by twinturborx7pete' date='Mar 30 2003, 09:10 PM
eh i like non seq... more predictable boost... and if you see my engine bay, you'd understand 3 vacuum lines.
probably easier to controll boost too right?
FikseRxSeven is offline  
Old 03-30-2003, 11:30 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
twinturborx7pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Panama City Beach, Florida
Posts: 993
Default

yep...
twinturborx7pete is offline  
Old 03-31-2003, 09:59 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
rxtacy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 208
Default

eh i like non seq... more predictable boost... and if you see my engine bay, you'd understand 3 vacuum lines.
so do you ever run at 15psi? if so what kind of power do you get out of the extra 5psi? i'm just curious cuz i'm gonna switch my j-spec turbos to non-seq soon.
rxtacy is offline  


Quick Reply: 99 Jdm Turbo's Efficacy Graph



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.