|
Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Jan 29 2004, 12:40 PM
its prolly true, it would be easy to check too. all you need is a micrometer
|
Originally Posted by j200pruf' date='Jan 29 2004, 05:38 AM
I heard that the renesis e-shaft will gointo a 13b, and its lighter and balanced better than previous e-shafts.
|
pp= port and polish not a P-port....
|
what year motor would u be using?
|
Originally Posted by Turbo II' date='Jan 29 2004, 02:10 PM
what year motor would u be using?
the only thing with an unspecified year in the list above would be the rotor and side housings. Anything post-'86 should be fine, right? Are there any differences in housings between S4 and S5? |
Originally Posted by Baldy' date='Jan 29 2004, 10:18 AM
unless your question was directed at someone else....
the only thing with an unspecified year in the list above would be the rotor and side housings. Anything post-'86 should be fine, right? Are there any differences in housings between S4 and S5? |
N/A all the way because no one likes the turbo lag.
|
Originally Posted by donhayes' date='Jan 29 2004, 01:59 PM
N/A all the way because no one likes the turbo lag.
|
I know the renesis E-shafts are lighter but I just don't know how much. I just called the friendly folx at Mazdatrix and they did not have one to weigh. For some reason 1 pound sticks out in my mind though.
|
So, is the general consensus that, though very cool, this hypothetical engine would be a waste to build, considering the power available in a turbo motor?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands