Turbo Vs. Na Modified??

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 4, 2003 | 08:01 AM

#31

1988RedT2

Super Moderator

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 2,535

From: VA

While its certainly possible to make an n/a fast, by the time you did, you'd have spent more than if you just went out and bought a turbo.

If you have a serious need for speed, buy a Turbo II.

If you want a fun, economical daily driver, buy an n/a.

And while there are exceptions to this rule, remember: The faster your car is, the more time its going to spend sitting in the shop getting fixed.

And most definitely: As the speed of your car increases, so does the rate at which money flies out of your wallet. There are no exceptions to this rule!

Nov 4, 2003 | 08:09 AM

#32

twstdmtl

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 292

From: Central KY

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1988RedT2' date='Nov 4 2003, 06:01 AM

As the speed of your car increases, so does the rate at which money flies out of your wallet. There are no exceptions to this rule!

You got that right!

Nov 4, 2003 | 11:35 AM

#33

relisys190

Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 582

From: Tampa

I'll go with N/A modded running a happy mid 12

And i'm NOT a drag racer either. It could be an extreamly balanced sports car still getting 15mpg

-Markus

"I love N.A."

Nov 5, 2003 | 09:26 PM

#34

DJ Blu

Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 442

From: Long Island, NY

you sia d you need the ride to get you to work... so if you need reliability, you better go with the na. cuz turbo 2's as much fun and a fast as they can be are not as reliable.