2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Turbo Vs. Na Modified??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 04:48 PM
  #21  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

oh i think the s5 upper is better than the s4, but i dont have hard numbers



mike
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 05:25 PM
  #22  
Racer X's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,542
From: Vanderhoof,BC(Canada)
Default

Originally Posted by pengaru' date='Jan 30 2003, 02:42 PM
[quote name='j9fd3s' date='Jan 30 2003, 10:39 PM'] i think the na upper intake is a lot better than the t2's



mike
what about s4 vs s5, both na? [/quote]

I think for turbo applications the RE intake is the best upper intake I have seen for flow design stock.
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 05:44 PM
  #23  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

yah that and the fd are both good



mike
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 11:09 PM
  #24  
Slick92GS-R's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2
From: ..jus hit VTEC & about to go around u ...
Default

darrell, here are the specs on that 275 hp fella ....



Phillips B-32, 105 octane

Engine 13b bridge port, 75' 13b rotor housings, '89 rotors & shaft, lightened & balanced, hardened stationary gears, carbon apex seals and oil baffle plate.

Intake Weber 48 IDA

Exhaust Custom stainless steel header, 24" primary, 3" main, DynoMax 3" in/out

Cooling 84-85 SE oil cooler, be cool radiator, Mezier electric 35GPM water pump (remotely mounted)

Ignition Direct Fire, Jacobs Rotary Pack..



the power i would say is from the bridge port, 105 octane, the balancing & electric water pump...(remember what i told u about those )

...he is very impressive though ..
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 11:21 PM
  #25  
Racer X's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,542
From: Vanderhoof,BC(Canada)
Default

Originally Posted by Slick92GS-R' date='Jan 30 2003, 09:09 PM
darrell, here are the specs on that 275 hp fella ....



Phillips B-32, 105 octane

Engine 13b bridge port, 75' 13b rotor housings, '89 rotors & shaft, lightened & balanced, hardened stationary gears, carbon apex seals and oil baffle plate.

Intake Weber 48 IDA

Exhaust Custom stainless steel header, 24" primary, 3" main, DynoMax 3" in/out

Cooling 84-85 SE oil cooler, be cool radiator, Mezier electric 35GPM water pump (remotely mounted)

Ignition Direct Fire, Jacobs Rotary Pack..



the power i would say is from the bridge port, 105 octane, the balancing & electric water pump...(remember what i told u about those )

...he is very impressive though ..
Theres a link to that page thru the link to the thread in the engine and porting forum.Then theres Rotarymans ultimate NA 310hp engine idea.Nice maxed out NA with a hint of NOS. BTW nice location you have listed there.I love it when people brag they have Vtec and think they're fast enough to win a race.The sorry looks when they lose to someone else. :bigthumg:
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 11:39 PM
  #26  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

Speed is an addiction, you just want more and more, you can't get it fast enough while being n/a and there is a limit which you can reach quickly, that still isn't anywhere near enough. Well atleast this has been my experience.
I don't care much for "speed".. even though it did feel cool hitting 140.. what I really like is how "quick" the car is.. from point to point. That's just me though.
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 01:10 PM
  #27  
Slick92GS-R's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2
From: ..jus hit VTEC & about to go around u ...
Default

Originally Posted by Racer X' date='Jan 30 2003, 09:21 PM
BTW nice location you have listed there.I love it when people brag they have Vtec and think they're fast enough to win a race.The sorry looks when they lose to someone else. :bigthumg:.... ..


i'm not quite sure what to make of that statement there MR Guru...



Old Jan 31, 2003 | 03:43 PM
  #28  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by rx7machine' date='Jan 31 2003, 12:39 AM
Speed is an addiction, you just want more and more, you can't get it fast enough while being n/a and there is a limit which you can reach quickly, that still isn't anywhere near enough. Well atleast this has been my experience.
I don't care much for "speed".. even though it did feel cool hitting 140.. what I really like is how "quick" the car is.. from point to point. That's just me though.
I don't care about going 180mph, just whipping the head back, thats what its all about
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 02:45 PM
  #29  
twstdmtl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 292
From: Central KY
Default

Originally Posted by Slick92GS-R' date='Jan 30 2003, 09:09 PM
darrell, here are the specs on that 275 hp fella ....



Phillips B-32, 105 octane

Engine 13b bridge port, 75' 13b rotor housings, '89 rotors & shaft, lightened & balanced, hardened stationary gears, carbon apex seals and oil baffle plate.

Intake Weber 48 IDA

Exhaust Custom stainless steel header, 24" primary, 3" main, DynoMax 3" in/out

Cooling 84-85 SE oil cooler, be cool radiator, Mezier electric 35GPM water pump (remotely mounted)

Ignition Direct Fire, Jacobs Rotary Pack..
The price of those mods would be pretty hefty. I have seen carbon apex seals alone go for 1800 USD.
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 05:55 AM
  #30  
sidewinderx7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,312
From: WA
Default

you also have to remember, bridge ports dont exactly last too long, and they arent very ideal for a street car .. unless you like the 2k+ fluctuating idle. If you drive the car everyday, its a bad idea, i think anyways. You might want to.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.