2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Turbo Vs. Na Modified??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:25 AM
  #11  
Racer X's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,542
From: Vanderhoof,BC(Canada)
Default

Originally Posted by InfamousReX' date='Jan 29 2003, 08:26 PM
RacerX: so your recomending a modified car./efi system with a port and mix and matching the motor itself??
With a hint of Zex mind you but yeah why not?You like the car don't you?
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 09:36 AM
  #12  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

get a t2.I wish someone would have told me this a while ago, its not worth the $$$ to modify an n/a.Unless you plan on autocross. I would have saved so much money.
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 10:57 AM
  #13  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

bridgeporto!



mike
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 12:01 PM
  #14  
pengaru's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,930
From: IL
Default

someone needs to do some serious intake experimenting with the NA 13B's, I suspect alot of the power gains in the renesis is in the intake.
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 12:08 PM
  #15  
FCmaniac's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,801
From: Eastern PA
Default

Yeah, boost is definitely addictive. I miss it but at the same time I love the reliability/simplicity/and cost of my NA plus I'm only interested in Autocross now. My drag racing days are over...... not that T2's can't be great autocrossers though.
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:53 PM
  #16  
StillInHighSchool's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 34
From: Concord, NC
Default

take a look at it the other way..im goin to tell you what i asked my mechanic when i first got into my new n/a.. he told me that while a tII can kick *** a modified n/a woudl be fast aswell and more dependable......not to mention sometimes turbos can go out real quik...neighbor hates rx-7s cause his tubo blew the same week he bought it new..and it was a gen 2...but i dont know **** myself..just telling you what ive heard...
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:56 PM
  #17  
Turbo II's Avatar
omghi2u
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,259
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Jan 30 2003, 08:57 AM
bridgeporto!



mike
:bigthumg:
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 04:10 PM
  #18  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

Speed is an addiction, you just want more and more, you can't get it fast enough while being n/a and there is a limit which you can reach quickly, that still isn't anywhere near enough. Well atleast this has been my experience.
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 04:39 PM
  #19  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by pengaru' date='Jan 30 2003, 10:01 AM
someone needs to do some serious intake experimenting with the NA 13B's, I suspect alot of the power gains in the renesis is in the intake.
i think the na upper intake is a lot better than the t2's



mike
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 04:42 PM
  #20  
pengaru's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,930
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Jan 30 2003, 10:39 PM
i think the na upper intake is a lot better than the t2's



mike
what about s4 vs s5, both na?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.