2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

GTU or TurboII

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2007, 10:48 PM
  #11  
Member
 
moltar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 42
Default

If you want a turbo just get a Turbo II. Don't turbo a GTU.
moltar is offline  
Old 02-24-2007, 11:37 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
fc3sboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: watertown wisconsin
Posts: 1,331
Default

when the **** did we get ice cream! did you get ice cream?
fc3sboy1 is offline  
Old 02-24-2007, 11:42 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
fc3sboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: watertown wisconsin
Posts: 1,331
Default

Originally Posted by sen2two' post='860982' date='Feb 24 2007, 06:28 PM

compressions:



s4 TII 8.5

s5 TII 9.0



s4 N/A 9.4

s5 N/A 9.7



GTU is supposed to be lighter. also it comes with some body styling differences. get the TII...



plus different designs in manifolds
also the s5 rotors are around 9.5 pounds where the s4 rotors are in the 11 pound range. now as far as the gtu body is concerned there was no change, the gtus now that had an aluminum hood and a few other light weight things as well as what im told a compleat t2 driveline with an na motor and t2 suspention and breaks. but then again the gxl had them breaks aswell. like i said before dont molest a gtus man.
fc3sboy1 is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 02:39 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
fcdrifter13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 18
Default

The S5 GTU is the base model Fc for 89-91. The 88GTU Was the sportiest NA in the S4(86-88) and has the factory body kit shared with the 88 T2 as with the wing, 4 wheel disk brakes with the turbo front brakes(larger), stiffer suspension, and is the second lightest FC, the lightest being the sport that does not have a sunroof. The 88GTU also has the turbo seats, sunroof, AC, PS, but does not have power windows or a rear hatch wiper.





As I said earlier the S5 GTU is the base. But the GTUs(note the small s)model is comparable to the 88GTU with some differences. Such as heavier wieght and a slightly softer suspension that the S5s had. THe biggest difference is what would have been done. The GTUs was supposed to have a 20b NA but the plans were nixed due to insurance, fuel consumption, and other things.
fcdrifter13 is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 05:55 AM
  #15  
Super Moderator
 
1988RedT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 2,532
Default

Originally Posted by machineRX' post='860929' date='Feb 24 2007, 03:15 PM

in another post someone asked if their t2 would run ok without the turbo, and was told not really because the compression was too low (except KompressorLOgic says its the same)? im guessing that mazda messed with compression (not to mention the ecu) just to put turbos on?


If you check the compression numbers on other engines (you know, those funny piston engines) you'll find that turbo'd engines typically run lower compression ratios than normally aspirated engines. Not to worry, the turbo will more than make up for it!
1988RedT2 is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 08:49 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
sen2two's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kissimmee FL.
Posts: 1,579
Default

Originally Posted by bboyclo' post='860986' date='Feb 24 2007, 08:54 PM

hmmm.....yeah i'm contemplating on which one to get....so if i put on a bolt on turbo on a GTU will that be worth it?




theres no bolt up turbo kit. what would it be worth???



high compression + rotary turbo + inexperienced with RX7's = blown motor & empty pocket...



get the TII...
sen2two is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 08:03 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: WA, Renton
Posts: 714
Default

Originally Posted by machineRX' post='860929' date='Feb 24 2007, 12:15 PM

in another post someone asked if their t2 would run ok without the turbo, and was told not really because the compression was too low (except KompressorLOgic says its the same)? im guessing that mazda messed with compression (not to mention the ecu) just to put turbos on?


no i didnt say they are the same,



the compression ratio is different between NA and Turbo, but its not that much lower it will still run pretty well u might lose like 10-15 hp but thats it....





ohh i have ran an na-turbo setup before it works well and is alot of fun, but generally speaking its cheaper and a better idea to get a real t2 motor.
KompressorLOgic is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 12:50 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
Siwel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pburg, WV
Posts: 13
Default

I have both, an 87 T2 and an 88' GTU w/S5 swap.

I can say I like my T2 alot more mainly because of the power. If you are wanting just a nice car to drive I say go for the GTU. You will prob have less money in it than you will a T2.



My GTU w/just a few minor things like intake and full exhaust runs exceptionally well.
Siwel is offline  
Old 03-16-2007, 04:16 PM
  #19  
Member
 
JohnnyChon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 39
Default

Really there are turbo rx-7's and non turbo rx-7's. Everything else is trim packages. (within each series)
JohnnyChon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
COsborne
RX-7 & RX-8 Parts For Sale & Wanted
12
06-25-2002 12:12 PM
dead0man
RX-7 & RX-8 For Sale
11
03-15-2002 04:39 AM
Peenore
2nd Generation Specific
2
02-14-2002 07:22 PM
MtnRacer
2nd Generation Specific
18
01-04-2002 10:41 PM
ryan
2nd Generation Specific
2
12-06-2001 11:51 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: GTU or TurboII



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.