2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Carbon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #1  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

or lack thereof. this engine has 175,000miles on it, notice how little carbon is in it.











how would atf/mmo/water/detergent/anyother household cleaner help this?
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #2  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

Yea well they don't call the atf a trick for nothing.
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #3  
Rotaryman88's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,705
From: Pimp'n ain't E-Z! But driving ur FD makes it easier!
Default

That motor saw a lot of high revs in it's 175K miles of use...





..the ATF thing DOES work, but is usually misunderstood..it began with damn jspecs I think, because anytime I've delt w/ jspecs that wont run right from the getgo...the vendor says to use ATF or MMO in the engine because they put a solution in the engines before shipping to prevent rust..but if left to sit too long, the solution can stick the seals..its only a last resort thing anyways..
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 09:43 AM
  #4  
roadkill669's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 572
From: Culpeper, VA
Default

Somebody correct me if i'm wrong, but I have always been under the impression that as long as the side seals are all in good shape, there shouldn't be any carbon on the sides of the rotor, only on the faces where combustion takes place.



So therefore, this motor had exceptionally good side seals
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 01:33 PM
  #5  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by roadkill669' date='Feb 15 2004, 10:43 AM
only on the faces where combustion takes place.
umm wouldnt that be all the faces?



kevin.
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 01:36 PM
  #6  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by teknics' date='Feb 15 2004, 11:33 AM
umm wouldnt that be all the faces?



kevin.
no the sides could be considered faces too
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 01:48 PM
  #7  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Feb 15 2004, 02:36 PM
no the sides could be considered faces too
really? never knew that. i thought a triangle had 3 faces.



kevin.
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 02:20 PM
  #8  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by teknics' date='Feb 15 2004, 11:48 AM
really? never knew that. i thought a triangle had 3 faces.



kevin.
tomato!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RX7ryder
Interior, Exterior, Audio Mods
3
Jul 1, 2002 08:52 AM
Nisus
2nd Generation Specific
52
Jun 24, 2002 02:33 PM
Nisus
2nd Generation Specific
6
Jun 20, 2002 01:26 AM
Nisus
1st Generation Specific
4
Jun 18, 2002 08:11 AM
treceb
Insert BS here
9
Feb 14, 2002 08:57 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.