2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

250 whp ?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 05:35 PM
  #11  
Shane.Trammell's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,326
From: Richardson Texas
Default

Originally Posted by pengaru' date='Sep 19 2002, 03:19 PM
This question is too easy, lets make it more difficult. 250RWHP, streetable, no bottle, NA.



Anyone?
oh ive got that right here. 502 rat in a 1st gen. you didnt say it had to be a rotary.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 05:53 PM
  #12  
pengaru's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,930
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by Shane.Trammell' date='Sep 19 2002, 11:35 PM
[quote name='pengaru' date='Sep 19 2002, 03:19 PM']This question is too easy, lets make it more difficult. 250RWHP, streetable, no bottle, NA.



Anyone?
oh ive got that right here. 502 rat in a 1st gen. you didnt say it had to be a rotary.[/quote]

it was implied



13B, NA.



I think it's doable with the proper mods, intake manifold tuning and porting i believe will play a very significant role in obtaining this. Along with programmable engine management.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 06:26 PM
  #13  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Shane.Trammell' date='Sep 19 2002, 06:35 PM
[quote name='pengaru' date='Sep 19 2002, 03:19 PM']This question is too easy, lets make it more difficult. 250RWHP, streetable, no bottle, NA.



Anyone?
oh ive got that right here. 502 rat in a 1st gen. you didnt say it had to be a rotary.[/quote]

No need for a rat silly man, a 350 GM targetmaster engine, with warranty, has 350 hp. Look at my post in the "OTHER CARS" section about that 500 hp ZR-1
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 09:30 PM
  #14  
cropman84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7
Default

no intercooler needed to run 250whp??
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 09:32 PM
  #15  
Shane.Trammell's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,326
From: Richardson Texas
Default

but the 502 much more fun
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 09:45 PM
  #16  
89 Rag's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,467
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by cropman84' date='Sep 19 2002, 08:30 PM
no intercooler needed to run 250whp??
Vosko's post stated FMIC, that would be a yes.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 09:48 PM
  #17  
89 Rag's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,467
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by Shane.Trammell' date='Sep 19 2002, 08:32 PM
but the 502 much more fun
Fun? the fuggin heads would hit the strut towers, A BB in a first gen-the torque might twist the chassis in half
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 09:51 PM
  #18  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 89 Rag' date='Sep 19 2002, 10:45 PM
[quote name='cropman84' date='Sep 19 2002, 08:30 PM']no intercooler needed to run 250whp??
Vosko's post stated FMIC, that would be a yes.[/quote]

i knew somebody could read
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 02:06 PM
  #19  
cropman84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7
Default

fmic?? whats that stand for, in case u couldnt tell im kinda new to rx-7's, im a 240sx man
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 02:40 PM
  #20  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by cropman84' date='Sep 20 2002, 03:06 PM
fmic?? whats that stand for, in case u couldnt tell im kinda new to rx-7's, im a 240sx man
Front Mounted InterCooler



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.