2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

15A?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2002, 06:44 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Rotarydragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Close enough to annoy you.
Posts: 1,381
Default

I've seen pics of this motor, I wonder if Mazda ever turned any out?



"Your stray thought of the day, every day" - Rotarydragon
Rotarydragon is offline  
Old 05-18-2002, 07:15 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
kimo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 103
Default

where did you see a pic of a 15A motor Ihave never heard of one. I know NASA was working on some a while back i am not sure waht size it was.



post a link to a pic for us
kimo3 is offline  
Old 05-18-2002, 07:50 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Never heard of it.



1967 - 10A 491 cc x 2 ROTOR

1969 - 13A 655 cc x 2 ROTOR

1970 - 12A 573 cc x 2 ROTOR

1973 - 13B 654 cc x 2 ROTOR

1990 - 20B 654 cc x 3 ROTOR

1991 - R26B 654 cc x 4 ROTOR
ILUVMY88CABRIO is offline  
Old 05-18-2002, 08:20 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
dysthymia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 946
Default

The engine is discussed here. Sounds like it would have been a nice little motor, had it been produced.
dysthymia is offline  
Old 05-18-2002, 08:45 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 3,097
Default

It produced 135hp @ 5750 rpm and 196Nm (145 lb-ft) @ 3500 rpm.
It seems pretty weak. What were they going to put it in.
ILUVMY88CABRIO is offline  
Old 05-18-2002, 08:50 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
dysthymia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 946
Default

Originally Posted by ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='May 18 2002, 05:45 PM
It produced 135hp @ 5750 rpm and 196Nm (145 lb-ft) @ 3500 rpm.
It seems pretty weak. What were they going to put it in.
Well, it was developed in the seventies. Think of that engine in Series V N/A spec, and I think the numbers would be far more impressive.



I imagine they would probably have used it in an RX-3 or RX-4, or whatever.
dysthymia is offline  
Old 05-18-2002, 09:16 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
kimo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 103
Default

I still wouldn't want to put it in any of my cars. Its HP is only 135 that was more like the r100 or rx2
kimo3 is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 09:09 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Rotarydragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Close enough to annoy you.
Posts: 1,381
Default

http://www.vision.net.au/~bhaslam/engine_p...ics/diffeng.jpg



Another pic



Rotor pics
Rotarydragon is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 12:13 PM
  #9  
dac
Senior Member
 
dac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 790
Default

I'd always wondered why Mazda didn't do a BIGGER motor, but I guess they did.



What I want are the new RENESIS housings and sideplates. 0- overlap on exhaust and intake with that sideport design... I wonder when RacingBeat or someone will start selling these for the rest of us. Image that motor with a Turbo on it. 400 HP should be CAKE.
dac is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 12:40 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
13BAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7,316
Default

Originally Posted by dac' date='May 19 2002, 12:13 PM
I'd always wondered why Mazda didn't do a BIGGER motor, but I guess they did.



What I want are the new RENESIS housings and sideplates. 0- overlap on exhaust and intake with that sideport design... I wonder when RacingBeat or someone will start selling these for the rest of us. Image that motor with a Turbo on it. 400 HP should be CAKE.
The side exhaust ports definitely help with both fuel economy and emmissions, but I don't know if they'll allow for the strong exhaust pulses rotaries have always had. The strong exhaust pulses are what allows us to run such large turbos with acceptable amounts of lag.
13BAce is offline  


Quick Reply: 15A?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 AM.