twin turbo in my first gen.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Originally Posted by jes' post='781212' date='Nov 24 2005, 10:59 AM
one issue I see right away is track...
The 1st gen is 55.9" and the 2nd gen is 57.1"...
is 1st gen steering really that bad? only thing i really notice is that on the track you have to help straighten the wheels too.
the play mostly comes out with adjustment, and the effort is on the high side i guess but it has better feel than the fc did with a manual rack, and the fc manual rack is super super slow ratio
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,748
From: Columbia IL/St. Louis MO
You really don't need a 9" ford rear. Diretfreak has that because he abuses his drivetrain. You should be able to get away with using a TII rear end. It seems the TII rear end is stronger than the FD's?
Plus that 9" rear end is HEAVY.
Plus that 9" rear end is HEAVY.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,326
From: Richardson Texas
Originally Posted by rowtareh' post='781489' date='Nov 25 2005, 07:42 PM
You really don't need a 9" ford rear. Diretfreak has that because he abuses his drivetrain. You should be able to get away with using a TII rear end. It seems the TII rear end is stronger than the FD's?
Plus that 9" rear end is HEAVY.
fbs have live axle rears while fcs have irs
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)