Suspension, Wheels, Brakes, Tires Power to the ground starts here.

Someone School Me Please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2005, 03:55 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

[quote name='RETed' date='Apr 23 2005, 07:20 AM']8", +35 is too close with stock suspension.

I've seen 8", +35 rims, and they all don't fit up front; spacers are needed.

I like to go at least with a +30 or less offset to make an 8" fit up front with a 225 wide tire.



If going with aftermarket coilovers, those with adjustable damper height (NOT spring height) can be spun upwards to clear rims with more offset - like 10mm more easily.



This is how people can claim 8" wide +40 can fit up front...

-Ted

[snapback]703638[/snapback]

[/quote]



I have 16x8 on 5.500 inch backspace or in other words +25 and it hits my coilover spring perch. I had to run an 8 mm spacer with longer studs...
Cheers! is offline  
Old 05-16-2005, 10:21 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 925
Default

[quote name='Cheers!' date='May 14 2005, 12:55 PM']I have 16x8 on 5.500 inch backspace or in other words +25 and it hits my coilover spring perch. I had to run an 8 mm spacer with longer studs...

[snapback]712897[/snapback]

[/quote]

That can't be right?

8" / 2 = 4.0"

+25 offset pushes that to 5.0"

There's still an extra 0.5" of backspacing.

I realize that "rim lip" isn't always factored in offset, but 0.5" of rim lip sounds like a lot.



Backspacing on stock Turbo II rims is 5.0".

You can probably go another 1/4" before the rim starts to contact the inner parts.

So we're still back to 1/4" of rim somewhere...which is consistent with your numbers.





-Ted
RETed is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:23 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
djgiantrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,019
Default

i used to run a 17x8 +38 with a 235 tire in the front on eibach springs with tokico shocks and it didnt hit the suspension, did rub the body inside at full lock however. I have coilovers now and they didnt even come close to fitting.
djgiantrobot is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:07 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

ive got 17x8 32 offset wheels with 235/45/17's on em, and theres room on the inside (i do have coil overs), they do stick out of the wheel wells just slightly. i also need some camber to keep the fenders intact.



j9fd3s is offline  
Old 05-19-2005, 07:01 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

[quote name='RETed' date='May 16 2005, 10:21 AM']That can't be right?

8" / 2 = 4.0"

+25 offset pushes that to 5.0"

There's still an extra 0.5" of backspacing.

I realize that "rim lip" isn't always factored in offset, but 0.5" of rim lip sounds like a lot.



Backspacing on stock Turbo II rims is 5.0".

You can probably go another 1/4" before the rim starts to contact the inner parts.

So we're still back to 1/4" of rim somewhere...which is consistent with your numbers.

-Ted

[snapback]713600[/snapback]

[/quote]



hrm... i went by the the chart on www.rsracing.com/tech-wheel.html which appears to be down right now...
Cheers! is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TurboSmoke
Insert BS here
17
03-29-2003 02:48 PM
RXCrazy
Insert BS here
6
10-10-2002 10:53 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Someone School Me Please



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 PM.