2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

ID this turbo II...help please!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 12:33 AM
  #1  
nsxguy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

I have a Turbo II motor that i bought off a kid for $700...if it needs a rebuild, who cares?

It is very clean and came with everything...he claims it is a JDM motor with 35 K on it.

Problem is, i dont know what year it is, if its an S4 or an S5, etc. Anyone know how to ID it? Thanks!
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 12:55 AM
  #2  
RicerJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 737
From: Folsom, CA
Default

number of fan blades will tell you i believe its s4=8 s5 =10
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 02:14 AM
  #3  
nsxguy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

Thanks much...do S4 and S5 motors differ that much? The parts guy at Mazdza insists that the differences are very slight...
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 03:42 AM
  #4  
RicerJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 737
From: Folsom, CA
Default

different manifolds from what i have been told is another way
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 07:58 AM
  #5  
nsxguy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

thanks for your help...looks like i have an S4. Can anyone tell me if, in their opinion, this thing is worth building up a little? Or is it a bit of a dog and the reason there was an S5?
Old Aug 29, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #6  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by nsxguy7
Thanks much...do S4 and S5 motors differ that much? The parts guy at Mazdza insists that the differences are very slight...


s4 s5 most things are different, but usually just enough to make it not interchange.



the s5 engines are better, but there was no major fault with the s4's.
Old Aug 30, 2009 | 06:01 AM
  #7  
nsxguy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

anyone think i would be better off just scrapping all of the wiring, sensors, ecu, etc. and just going the megasquirt route?
Old Aug 30, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #8  
ROTARYWORX's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9
From: Fayetteville, North Carolina
Default

If you're thinking of going with a stand alone, Id go more of a Haltech route, Just saying this because this forum in particular has lots of support which can help you get on your way sooner should you run into any hiccups. As far as scrapping all the sensors and wiring harness... Most sensors if not all, can be re-used with your stand alone computer... all you have to do is connect the wiring leads supplied with your stand alone to the OEM connector of the sensors... so no don't scrap the sensors (except for the MAP if youre gonna run some serious boost)
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 06:44 PM
  #9  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by nsxguy7
anyone think i would be better off just scrapping all of the wiring, sensors, ecu, etc. and just going the megasquirt route?


depends.. ive done plenty of haltechs, and next time i'm buying an RTEK.



megasquirt looks good, although ive never used it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SYCO
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
2
Mar 24, 2009 11:56 AM
ChainSawOnSteroids
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
8
Feb 21, 2007 10:45 AM
FrostRacing
2nd Generation Specific
24
Oct 24, 2003 10:15 AM
bacca
2nd Generation Specific
16
Jul 15, 2003 10:18 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.