Single Turbo Discussion Area for discussing single turbo RX-7's.

From: Why The Hks Manifold Sux "pics"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2005, 06:23 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: La Plata, Maryland
Posts: 9,725
Default

Originally Posted by teknics' date='Feb 4 2005, 01:07 AM
yea i definitely prefer a cast manifold especially when it comes to a big/heavy turbo. I know vosko had problems with his T78 breaking SS manis, and by holding mine i can definitely see why. the ****** is heavy, so unless you brace it up or put braces all over the SS manifold (defeating the whole "SS is pretty" thing) then cast is a lot better.



plus when adding things as important as a manifold who chooses something cause its "prettier"?



I'm going to run that HKS "log" manifold as well, but im going to try to use the RB flange to try an idea i have in my head to make the port line up better.



kevin.



Did I say I would take looks over functionality? I just said the other one looks like *** and it does. Believe me Kevin if my **** starts breaking I will remedy the problem even if it looks like ***.
Fd3BOOST is offline  
Old 02-04-2005, 01:44 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
94touring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 3,346
Default

GMON- interesting writeup and description. I hope others can use what you've found.



I did some cleaning....
94touring is offline  
Old 02-04-2005, 05:21 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

Originally Posted by Fd3BOOST' date='Feb 4 2005, 07:22 AM
Did I say I would take looks over functionality? I just said the other one looks like *** and it does. Believe me Kevin if my **** starts breaking I will remedy the problem even if it looks like ***.



actually before a mod cleaned up the topic you said



"...i prefer SS because, for one its prettier..."



of course thats not verbatim but the word pretty was in there.



kevin.
teknics is offline  
Old 02-17-2005, 08:58 AM
  #44  
ReZ
Senior Member
 
ReZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canyon Country, CALIFORNIA
Posts: 123
Default

What is up with all this crap? Certified welder? LOL. I'd ebay that manifold and custom make your own. You will be by far more satisfied with your result. As far as keeping the item being welded up to temps, F-that! This **** isn't being shot out into space!



If your manifold cracks (Not break. If it breaks, like fall on the ground, you shouldn't jump your car off ramps. You have issues.) reweld the crack. It's that simple.



TIG, MIG, ARC, oxy-acetylene... They all get the job done. I prefer mig for steel items. It's quick, easy, and the welds come out fantastic.



Why the hell do people need shiny SS manifolds? It's really retarded... Yes. BLING. Big whoop!
ReZ is offline  
Old 02-17-2005, 04:06 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GMON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 500
Default

My thoughts exactly! Again, it was just an FYI for other 7 owners.





Originally Posted by ReZ' date='Feb 17 2005, 06:58 AM
What is up with all this crap? Certified welder? LOL. I'd ebay that manifold and custom make your own. You will be by far more satisfied with your result. As far as keeping the item being welded up to temps, F-that! This **** isn't being shot out into space!



If your manifold cracks (Not break. If it breaks, like fall on the ground, you shouldn't jump your car off ramps. You have issues.) reweld the crack. It's that simple.



TIG, MIG, ARC, oxy-acetylene... They all get the job done. I prefer mig for steel items. It's quick, easy, and the welds come out fantastic.



Why the hell do people need shiny SS manifolds? It's really retarded... Yes. BLING. Big whoop!

GMON is offline  
Old 02-28-2005, 08:50 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
cymfc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,145
Default

Im running the cast manifold, my biggest reasons for running it was because it was so simple and would never crack.

As far as HP potential, i read just recently that kabooski's T2 did 520rwhp using the cast HKS manifold. *shrugs*
cymfc3s is offline  
Old 02-28-2005, 09:35 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

yea, im still gonna run this manifold on my setup, but ill clean-up the ports a bit, not gonna go overboard and weld it back and make them match perfectly.



and yea i heard of kabooski hitting 520 with this and i think someone else was up there too, like 480 or something.



kevin.
teknics is offline  
Old 02-28-2005, 10:17 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

Originally Posted by cymfc3s' date='Feb 28 2005, 09:50 PM
Im running the cast manifold, my biggest reasons for running it was because it was so simple and would never crack.

As far as HP potential, i read just recently that kabooski's T2 did 520rwhp using the cast HKS manifold. *shrugs*



Within the next month or two, depending on when someone gets their car back up and running, I will have dyno #s on the Hks log style manifold vs my SS tubular manifold.
1Revvin7 is offline  
Old 02-28-2005, 10:26 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
cymfc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,145
Default

Originally Posted by 1Revvin7' date='Feb 28 2005, 08:16 PM
Within the next month or two, depending on when someone gets their car back up and running, I will have dyno #s on the Hks log style manifold vs my SS tubular manifold.



If you can show a significant gain, ill drive up to phoenix, buy the manifold and you a coupla beers!!
cymfc3s is offline  
Old 02-28-2005, 10:58 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
cymfc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,145
Default

as a side note, all this talk about turbos, manifolds and flow has got me itching to get my car on the dyno and see what she'll do....
cymfc3s is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM.