Originally Posted by sleeper7' date='Feb 1 2004, 07:22 AM
9.4 rotors do not use as much fuel/air at a given boost # as does 8.5 rotors.
chuck Aurosting, how about a complete run-down of your setup? |
Anyone want to comment on the material the apex seals are made out of for NA engines?
|
Originally Posted by MazdaMike' date='Jan 30 2004, 09:35 PM
sounds awsome, u mount a fmic or u using something else for cooling?
|
Originally Posted by 94touring' date='Jan 30 2004, 09:41 PM
I believe its the material the apex seals are made out of that isn't good for boost. Also aren't the rotors a different compression? I'd be more concerned with the apex seals breaking.
|
OH yeah sorry to every on but i must reply like this because i dont use my computer too much and its the only way to talk to every one
|
Originally Posted by eddierotary' date='Jan 31 2004, 03:48 AM
man i would recomend to change those 550 injector for 680 or 720 secondary. i had my gslse engine with 4 x 550 and stock S4 turbo and it was sputtering because was running out of gas at 10 psi maibe is not the case for you. but just a recomendation https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...>/bigthumb.gif
|
Originally Posted by 1Revvin7' date='Jan 31 2004, 05:24 PM
You have an aftermarket turbo whats your point?
This is the funny part here: You have enough for 235-240rwhp safely, if using the stock ecu and stock static fuel pressure rate. Do you know why n/a boosted engine have a bad rap? Because most people who do them do ghetto work, and almost always pop the engine shortly after and am also taking precautions to avoid killing the engine and yeah if you want call it want you want ghetto work, amateur work, proffecional work if it works it works |
Originally Posted by sleeper7' date='Feb 1 2004, 03:22 AM
http://groups.msn.com/ChucksRX7/1983rx7.ms...oto&PhotoID=104
Aurosting check the link out. It is cheaper to make a n/a turbo then to do a turboII motor change. Nice to see others turbocharging n/a motors. 9.4 rotors do not use as much fuel/air at a given boost # as does 8.5 rotors. chuck |
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Feb 1 2004, 09:16 AM
Where did you get that idea? Higher compression actually raises the VE, which in turn increases the amount of air/fuel entering the chamber at any given time. Boost is entirely relative to how much air the engine is flowing. But thats still beside the point, because boost and compression ratio are completely independent of each other.
Aurosting, how about a complete run-down of your setup? 1----non-ported 6 port 1987 n/a high comp engine "9.4 compression"(seals and gasket of a t2 for safty and yes it can be done) 2----t2 intake manifold 3----msd fuel pressure regulator with boost index 4----4 t2 550cc injectors 5---- t2 fuel pump 6----t04b turbo a/r 96 p-trim 7 ----took the stock back end of a t2 turbo housing and got it bored out so the t04 fits in perfecty and got the whole turbo ceramic coeted and i also get to use the stock waste gate https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/smile.png 8----t2 stock down pipe with cat , no secondary cat 9----single 2.5 exhust with a 4" muffer 8----stock n/a trans 9----no power steering, a/c , and pollution pump 10----20w50 oil 11----ngk b9es spark plugs 12---- 4 puck bronz racing clutch 13----hks blow off valve 14----t2 hood 15----10 psi of boost 16----atkin one peice "wha u ma cal it"(dont remember its name) 17---- thats all i can remember off the top of my mind |
Originally Posted by 94touring' date='Feb 1 2004, 10:01 AM
Anyone want to comment on the material the apex seals are made out of for NA engines?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands