Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

Renesis Rotors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2003, 07:45 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Robbomaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 343
Default

To recap, a couple of months back we built a PP 13B with Renesis rotors for a Gen 1 S1 race car. Motor was specced & ported the same as the old one, with the rotors being the only real internal difference

All were interested in what difference the hi-comp rotors would make.

Well this motor has done 3 meets now with no issues other than a leaking oil cooler line. Car has dynoed (on the same dyno) at 24 hp more @ 8500 than the old engine when it was fresh. Mid-range torque is better, & driver reports much better punch out of corners.

So yes, using Renesis rotors gives an improvement. Not enough IMHO to pull apart a good motor to fit them (unless every last bit counts & the cost doesn't) The renesis rotors are the same price as the older types here, so 24rwhp for the cost of milling ther seal grooves makes it a must have at rebuild time for an NA!

Maybe even a turbo..........
Robbomaz is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 12:25 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

cool, the renisis rotors are cheap here, almost half the cost of the 9.7 rotors
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 12:46 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
13BAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7,316
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Nov 23 2003, 10:25 AM
cool, the renisis rotors are cheap here, almost half the cost of the 9.7 rotors
Are they really that cheap? What can you get a set for? What is the compression?
13BAce is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 01:04 PM
  #4  
Super Moderator
 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,763
Default

CR is 10.0 and they cost $305 USD each.
mazdaspeed7 is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 01:05 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
75 Repu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mike is a Liar!
Posts: 4,848
Default

what needs to be machined?
75 Repu is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 01:34 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: union, new jersey
Posts: 8,079
Default

hmmm... high compression and turbocharge means....... faster spool up and better low end...... right?
FikseRxSeven is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 01:58 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
MazdaMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Merrick NY / St.John's Uni Jamacia, NY
Posts: 1,073
Default

theres a downside do high compression turbocharged cars too. like blowing **** up
MazdaMike is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 02:12 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
jspecracer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 4,928
Default

Originally Posted by MazdaMike' date='Nov 24 2003, 04:58 AM
theres a downside do high compression turbocharged cars too. like blowing **** up
lol...that's the cost of horsepower too
jspecracer7 is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 02:27 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
13BAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7,316
Default

Originally Posted by jspecracer7' date='Nov 23 2003, 12:12 PM
lol...that's the cost of horsepower too
It always gives you a good story to tell your friends.
13BAce is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 04:10 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
BigTurbo74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,315
Default

ok i have a question, when using lower compression rotors for a high hp application, it is easy to use healthy amounts of boost to up your power. now with the higher compression rotors you can still boost the engine but it will be at a limit and tuning must be very precise correct? now what i want to know is which method is better in the sense of flat out making high power? low comp/high boost or high comp/low boost?
BigTurbo74 is offline  


Quick Reply: Renesis Rotors



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.