Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

Look what I found

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2005, 09:01 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
GreyGT-C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Disclaimer: posts made after 11AM are most likely alcohol induced. Please disregard unless very funn
Posts: 2,436
Default

so... if you have to install them after you build half the engine, and remove them to tear the engine down.... they are really just bolts without heads on them. Other than them being oversized,,, what is the benefit here?
GreyGT-C is offline  
Old 12-26-2005, 09:32 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

Originally Posted by Speedworks' post='789464' date='Dec 23 2005, 05:40 AM

they do not have the ribbed OEM tension section in the middle... As far as I remember those were an upgrade within Mazda itself as well.


Yes, but having a harder and denser fastener works just like the ribbed section.
1Revvin7 is offline  
Old 12-26-2005, 11:00 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
heretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 524
Default

Originally Posted by GreyGT-C' post='790059' date='Dec 26 2005, 07:01 PM

so... if you have to install them after you build half the engine, and remove them to tear the engine down.... they are really just bolts without heads on them. Other than them being oversized,,, what is the benefit here?


There are two ways to look at it.



Primarily in this instance, the studs are also acting as locating dowels. (Machining is required) Instead of two dowels, there would be 19-20 dowels. The benefit for the effort is somewhat debatable, but let it be known that Mazda determined that part of the reason for chattermarks in the chrome is partly because the rotor housing itself would oscillate.



Ordinarily, studs are used because they are more predictable than bolts. The torque stretches the bolt or stud, but the act of torquing a bolt also twists the bolt since the area you're torquing is so far away from where that torque is acting, the threads. Additionally, the bolt is threading into what can we can consider to be a old cast iron nut. The threads can gall or pull out on occasion. (I have never experienced it on a rotary, yet, but it gets depressingly common on certain popular engine blocks from the 1980s after a few head torquings) Using a stud helps this, since it is threaded in under no load, and the nut that applies the load is nice and hardened just like the stud.



I would worry about how well the studs can stretch to accomodate the aluminum housings, or if they will get crushed the first time the engine gets a little too hot. Probably not a problem for drag use.
heretic is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 10:06 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

Originally Posted by heretic' post='790092' date='Dec 27 2005, 12:00 AM

I would worry about how well the studs can stretch to accomodate the aluminum housings, or if they will get crushed the first time the engine gets a little too hot. Probably not a problem for drag use.
You make a good point here, and its something to consider. But to me the benefits seem to be greater than the downfalls at this point.
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 06:00 PM
  #15  
Kim
Senior Member
 
Kim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 214
Default

Im pretty sure that Gurumotorsports has put some research into this mod.

The bolts is a pretty tight fit and will follow the engines heatrange, using the proper steel and it will not cause a problem with engine expansion.
Kim is offline  
Old 12-28-2005, 02:50 AM
  #16  
Member
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 76
Default

One of the key benefits to s stud system is where the tension of the bolts is located. When you have a simple bolt system like stock, all of the stress of tightening them is located only at the threaded end with relatively lieelt stress throughout the bolts. With a stud system, you are splitting this stress in half between both sides, even if you torqued everything down the same. Instead of all of the rotational forces of tightening them down being all located at the front iron, half of the force is now also on the nut end. The bolts are stressed far less than they were before and more evenly over a larger area. It is even between the front and rear housings. This means you can apply more torque to tightening them down without worrying about stripping out a housing or breaking a bolt at the far end.
rotarygod is offline  
Old 12-28-2005, 10:59 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

This is an e-mail I recieved from mazdatrix
On the standard size stud kit, the tightening torque is 35ft. lbs. for engines under 500hp, and 42ft. lbs. for engines over 500hp. There is a similar torque spec for the oversize studs, but I don't have that information in front of me. The expansion of the bolts with heat is not an issue. They are being used as locator pins for all the housings, like doweling, so tighter is better in the diameter. The clearance when cold is .2mm. Expansion in length is accommodated in the tightening torque. Machining is going to be a big issue. We suspect that special tooling will be required to cut all the holes in line and then drill and tap the front side housing with the other housings in place. Our race motors use the standard size kit because we are not running turbo motors. We have not installed the oversize kit, and do not have the necessary tooling.

Geoff Barton

Mazdatrix

2730 Gundry Ave

Signal Hill, CA 90755

www.mazdatrix.com
So, it seems machiening is a little more extensive than I thought for the oversized studs... But there must be an easier way to line up the holes.
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 12-29-2005, 04:08 AM
  #18  
Member
 
Speedworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 67
Default

And what flywheel should be used with it? (FD engine)?



Both standard and oversized kit require a non- OEM flywheel
Speedworks is offline  
Old 12-29-2005, 10:33 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

Originally Posted by Speedworks' post='790497' date='Dec 29 2005, 05:08 AM
And what flywheel should be used with it? (FD engine)?



Both standard and oversized kit require a non- OEM flywheel
Im assuming any one using an auto counterweight.
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 12-30-2005, 08:57 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

Originally Posted by Speedworks' post='790497' date='Dec 29 2005, 06:08 AM

And what flywheel should be used with it? (FD engine)?



Both standard and oversized kit require a non- OEM flywheel


Well if you don't want to go that route; I sell a stock diameter stud kit for $325 shipped...
1Revvin7 is offline  


Quick Reply: Look what I found



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.