Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

briged p port

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 05:54 PM
  #1  
madaz matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 38
Default

After reading a couple of posts about porting the exhaust alot wider, the main problem is that the wider you go the less suport the apex seal has, my thoughts where if some how you could had a brige in the middle of the port or mabe two briges alowing you to go alot wider without fear of dropping an apex seal. this could eazely be done with rx8 housings. i got the idea from a mag that said that they were going to try it with p port intake. any thoughts apreciated.
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
RONIN FC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,420
From: Boston Ma.
Default

Thats a hot place to have a thin strand of aluminum.
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #3  
Lynn E. Hanover's Avatar
Fabricator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,322
From: Central Ohio (Hebron) Zephyrhills Fla.
Default

Originally Posted by madaz matt' post='825077' date='Jun 19 2006, 03:54 PM

After reading a couple of posts about porting the exhaust alot wider, the main problem is that the wider you go the less suport the apex seal has, my thoughts where if some how you could had a brige in the middle of the port or mabe two briges allowing you to go alot wider without fear of dropping an apex seal. this could eazely be done with rx8 housings. i got the idea from a mag that said that they were going to try it with p port intake. any thoughts apreciated.




Even in 2 cycle cylinders the vertical webs that support the ring in the center of the exhaust port often become deformed from the heat involved. Better to add a slight radius the engine side of the vertical but leave the body full width. But the rotary generally has higher EGTs, so not a good idea.



Also, there is little need to go much wider at all. And the apex seal (3MM) is very rigid and can span a much wider opening than you need to build.



The exhaust is still under a great amount of pressure when the ports are uncovered. A large amount of the total flow available will happen just after the port opens. So the port shape at the opening line is very important, and not much else is. So if the port is wider, (bigger cross sectional area per degree of rotation)the shape is even more important. So a radius at the open line and up the sides a bit, and little else matters.



So any shape that is smooth at the opening line (bellmouthed) straight from the open line to the port face.

And has a bit of a straight run in the exhaust tubing before the first bend, will flow like a jet engine.

This first flow after the opening, will be supersonic. Any deveation from a straight line and polished like chrome finish is less than ideal. Drag increases at the cube of velocity, so smoothness in exhaust flow is much more important than most people think.



Note that the first engines (10-A) had three round holes for exhaust ports. Not good enough for high revs?

Formula one engines have less area and turn over 20,000 RPM. So even the three holes are more than enough.





Lynn E. Hanover
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TweakGames
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
25
Oct 14, 2007 12:10 AM
mndfck2000
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
10
Sep 10, 2003 05:44 PM
redrum
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
1
Aug 20, 2003 09:18 PM
Bebirasta
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
12
Jul 27, 2003 05:46 PM
Bebirasta
2nd Generation Specific
0
Jul 21, 2003 04:57 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.