rx7_dren

oh anyone knows which burns more gas? turbo or N/A at the same HP

Feds

Theoretically, NA burns more.



The turbo extracts more energy from the combustion process, therefore more motion comes from less fuel.

Cheers!

[quote name='j9fd3s' date='Apr 10 2005, 07:07 PM']we did a cosmo motor with a hybrid stock fc turbo, and the stock 89t2 ecu+ fcon, it ran great


[/quote]



the OMPs are the same?

4RotorRocket

[quote name='rx7_dren' date='Apr 12 2005, 11:32 AM']a japan import store, selling it to me, ok so lemme get this a cosmo intake, and a 3rd gen engine with 2nd gen rotors for N/A app.



for turbo application, cosmo intake, 3rd gen motor

what im gonna do, http://www.magnusmotorsports.com/ ill get a intake manifold from them for the 3rd gen, do a 1/2 bridge, upgrade seals, then from there ill go turbo or N/A all depends


[/quote]



please pm me this japan import stores website or contact info.

rx7_dren

[quote name='Feds' date='Apr 12 2005, 08:20 AM']Theoretically, NA burns more.



The turbo extracts more energy from the combustion process, therefore more motion comes from less fuel.


[/quote]





thanks i was thinking the same

YellowT2

[quote name='Feds' date='Apr 12 2005, 08:20 AM']Theoretically, NA burns more.



The turbo extracts more energy from the combustion process, therefore more motion comes from less fuel.


[/quote]



yeah, but...



under boost turbos are tuned way rich for detonation prevention



and under vacuum the turbo acts more as an exhaust restriction, reducing efficiency