Rotary Engine Building and Porting FAQ Section FAQ Area for Rotary Engine Building and Porting

Eccentric Shaft Oil Jets Modification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2004, 01:28 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
scathcart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 203
Default

Its called overkill. There's little point for this on a street engine (I draw the line for streetability around 400 hp. Any more is not usable).



There are plenty of things you could do to make the engine bulletproof... balance the rotating assembling, clutch, flywheel, dowel the engine, have a forged 4340 chromoly 2-piece eccentric shaft custom ground.



Where do you draw the line? Sure it will cool better under extremely high-rpm use under large horsepower values, but how many of us drive like this on the street?



The jets were designed as they were for a reason, and a sound one at that.
scathcart is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 09:16 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Mazderati's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 334
Default

Its called overkill. There's little point for this on a street engine (I draw the line for streetability around 400 hp. Any more is not usable).


You are entitled to this opinion. Who is to say what is too little or too much? What one person thinks is enough might be too little for another and vice versa.



Where do you draw the line? Sure it will cool better under extremely high-rpm use under large horsepower values, but how many of us drive like this on the street?


It may be more a matter of the ability to drive like this without worrying about anything moreso than actually driving like this all of the time. Not to mention a daily driven car that is autocrossed or seeing occasional track time.



The modification stands as more than valid in my book. We will agree to disagree. :]
Mazderati is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 11:49 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

my opinions

1. rx7 club is a bad source of info, it can be good but for a lot of things you're getting incomplete info/guesses/the party line*



2. sometimes building lots of overkill is good, ie balancing, cleaning etc. sometimes overkill is bad, like ignition timing, theres a happy spot where if you go more you loose power. oil and water temps are the same way, if its too cold its not right. you also have to look at the usage of the car in question,

a street car needs to work on the street, which means its gotta idle and cruise, get decent mileage, etc etc.



i speak for myself here, but i find a large difference between a street car and a race car. while its possible to race a street car and dd a race car its often not the best solution.



the oil jet mods are certainly valid, but when they are valid is important too



mike

*ever try to tell someone over there the atf trick is indeed a trick? or that the split air pipe is mostly decorative?
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 11:57 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
scathcart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 203
Default

Originally Posted by Mazderati' date='Feb 13 2004, 07:16 AM
The modification stands as more than valid in my book. We will agree to disagree. :]
That's cool.

Cheers.
scathcart is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 06:07 PM
  #35  
Member
 
Erdin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london
Posts: 45
Default

on a FD if you do the oil jets mod and shim the front regulator and replace the main regulator with the 115psi one will the car still have a low oil pressur at idle or will that cure the problem if not is there any thing that will.
Erdin is offline  
Old 02-14-2004, 08:09 AM
  #36  
Junior Member
 
rotaryfanatik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6
Default

Funny how you shimmed the front relief to 110 and its stock 156. If you want to put a FD oil pressure regulator on an S4 or S5 all you need to do is take the old one out and put in the FD one. The front relief on an FD is the same as the FCs'....156 psi.
rotaryfanatik is offline  
Old 02-14-2004, 08:21 AM
  #37  
Member
 
Erdin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london
Posts: 45
Default

Originally Posted by rotaryfanatik' date='Feb 14 2004, 06:09 AM
Funny how you shimmed the front relief to 110 and its stock 156. If you want to put a FD oil pressure regulator on an S4 or S5 all you need to do is take the old one out and put in the FD one. The front relief on an FD is the same as the FCs'....156 psi.
so if i keep the front Regulator on the Fd stock and replace the main one with racing beat regulator and do the oil jet mod will i have a low oil pressure at idle, is there any thing that can be done to bring the oil pressure up at idle when you do the jet mod.
Erdin is offline  
Old 02-14-2004, 11:45 AM
  #38  
BDC
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Grand Prairie, TX
Posts: 917
Default

Originally Posted by rotaryfanatik' date='Feb 14 2004, 06:09 AM
Funny how you shimmed the front relief to 110 and its stock 156. If you want to put a FD oil pressure regulator on an S4 or S5 all you need to do is take the old one out and put in the FD one. The front relief on an FD is the same as the FCs'....156 psi.
Are you SURE about this? How did the engine act with just the regulator change only? I'd like to see some oil pressure figures at varying RPM's...



B
BDC is offline  
Old 02-14-2004, 01:18 PM
  #39  
Super Moderator
 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,763
Default

Originally Posted by rotaryfanatik' date='Feb 14 2004, 10:09 AM
Funny how you shimmed the front relief to 110 and its stock 156. If you want to put a FD oil pressure regulator on an S4 or S5 all you need to do is take the old one out and put in the FD one. The front relief on an FD is the same as the FCs'....156 psi.
Where did you get that information? It is wrong, plain and simple, for FC's at least. The front regulator is the same as, or slightly higher than the rear regulator. The FD front regulator would be slightly over 100 PSI, because the rear regulator is set to bypass right around 100-105 PSI. But 156 PSI is WAY too high.
mazdaspeed7 is offline  
Old 02-14-2004, 02:04 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
FrestyleFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Schofield Barracks, HI
Posts: 2,259
Default

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Feb 14 2004, 03:18 PM
Where did you get that information? It is wrong, plain and simple, for FC's at least. The front regulator is the same as, or slightly higher than the rear regulator. The FD front regulator would be slightly over 100 PSI, because the rear regulator is set to bypass right around 100-105 PSI. But 156 PSI is WAY too high.
156 is like blow up engine from massive oil spraying everywhere









and if you have the car apart...who cares...its so easy to do.its a great mod to do while its apart and costs < 10 dollars!
FrestyleFC3S is offline  


Quick Reply: Eccentric Shaft Oil Jets Modification



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.