Other Cars Non-rotary powered car discussion.

Subaru Wrx

Old Jan 30, 2003 | 12:30 PM
  #11  
UniqueTII's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,775
From: Ames, IA
Default

If I could afford a WRX, I'd be all over it. I am still considering a 2.5 RS, even though I'm leaning more towards a BMW 325iX when it's time to buy an AWD car.
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 12:32 PM
  #12  
Turbo II's Avatar
Thread Starter
omghi2u
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,259
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

they have AWD vans
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 12:38 PM
  #13  
Joe Flo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,142
From: Houston Texas
Default

Funny yall bring this one up. This morning on my way to school I saw a really nice looking silver one driving really slow. I got next to it only to realize it was an 80 year old woman driving it. It was so funny!! I dont know why....just was. Not too cool looking. Its getting a facelft next year anywho!
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 08:32 PM
  #14  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

Those WRXs are ******* ugly and feel cheap when you sit in them



Just my observation.
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 08:46 PM
  #15  
cymfc3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,145
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='Jan 30 2003, 06:32 PM
Those WRXs are ******* ugly and feel cheap when you sit in them



Just my observation.
the look growns on ya. And it sure beats a cookie cutter sedan. The interior is kinda nice. I paid 24k for the car, so i dont expect lexus trimmings.
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 07:50 AM
  #16  
Travis R's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 191
From: Austin, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='Jan 30 2003, 06:32 PM
Those WRXs are ******* ugly and feel cheap when you sit in them
There is only one other new car that I can think of that'll get to 60 in about 5.5 seconds, that costs less that $25K... and that was the Z28 Camaro. And guess what, it was ugly, and felt cheap inside (much worse than the Subaru, IMO). That's because they had to go cheap on something to keep the price down. So take your pick, cheap interior or cheap drivetrain.

Just my observation.
Actually I think that's your "opinion".
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 04:42 PM
  #17  
UniqueTII's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,775
From: Ames, IA
Default

Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='Jan 30 2003, 09:32 PM
Those WRXs are ******* ugly and feel cheap when you sit in them



Just my observation.
I hate the front end still...it hasn't grown on me, but I still like the cars in general.
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 04:52 PM
  #18  
Turbo II's Avatar
Thread Starter
omghi2u
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,259
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

get the 2.5 rs front end and head lights
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 05:01 PM
  #19  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Travis R' date='Jan 31 2003, 08:50 AM
There is only one other new car that I can think of that'll get to 60 in about 5.5 seconds, that costs less that $25K... and that was the Z28 Camaro. And guess what, it was ugly, and felt cheap inside (much worse than the Subaru, IMO). That's because they had to go cheap on something to keep the price down. So take your pick, cheap interior or cheap drivetrain.



Actually I think that's your "opinion".
sorry I offended you Travis.
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 05:05 PM
  #20  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo II' date='Jan 31 2003, 05:52 PM
get the 2.5 rs front end and head lights
Now your talking!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 PM.