Other Cars Non-rotary powered car discussion.

Subaru Wrx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2003, 12:30 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
UniqueTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 4,773
Default

If I could afford a WRX, I'd be all over it. I am still considering a 2.5 RS, even though I'm leaning more towards a BMW 325iX when it's time to buy an AWD car.
UniqueTII is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 12:32 PM
  #12  
omghi2u
Thread Starter
 
Turbo II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7,259
Default

they have AWD vans
Turbo II is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 12:38 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joe Flo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 1,142
Default

Funny yall bring this one up. This morning on my way to school I saw a really nice looking silver one driving really slow. I got next to it only to realize it was an 80 year old woman driving it. It was so funny!! I dont know why....just was. Not too cool looking. Its getting a facelft next year anywho!
Joe Flo is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 08:32 PM
  #14  
Super Moderator
 
Rob x-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Amityville, New York
Posts: 12,288
Default

Those WRXs are ******* ugly and feel cheap when you sit in them



Just my observation.
Rob x-7 is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 08:46 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
cymfc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,145
Default

Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='Jan 30 2003, 06:32 PM
Those WRXs are ******* ugly and feel cheap when you sit in them



Just my observation.
the look growns on ya. And it sure beats a cookie cutter sedan. The interior is kinda nice. I paid 24k for the car, so i dont expect lexus trimmings.
cymfc3s is offline  
Old 01-31-2003, 07:50 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Travis R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='Jan 30 2003, 06:32 PM
Those WRXs are ******* ugly and feel cheap when you sit in them
There is only one other new car that I can think of that'll get to 60 in about 5.5 seconds, that costs less that $25K... and that was the Z28 Camaro. And guess what, it was ugly, and felt cheap inside (much worse than the Subaru, IMO). That's because they had to go cheap on something to keep the price down. So take your pick, cheap interior or cheap drivetrain.

Just my observation.
Actually I think that's your "opinion".
Travis R is offline  
Old 01-31-2003, 04:42 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
UniqueTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 4,773
Default

Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='Jan 30 2003, 09:32 PM
Those WRXs are ******* ugly and feel cheap when you sit in them



Just my observation.
I hate the front end still...it hasn't grown on me, but I still like the cars in general.
UniqueTII is offline  
Old 01-31-2003, 04:52 PM
  #18  
omghi2u
Thread Starter
 
Turbo II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7,259
Default

get the 2.5 rs front end and head lights
Turbo II is offline  
Old 01-31-2003, 05:01 PM
  #19  
Super Moderator
 
Rob x-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Amityville, New York
Posts: 12,288
Default

Originally Posted by Travis R' date='Jan 31 2003, 08:50 AM
There is only one other new car that I can think of that'll get to 60 in about 5.5 seconds, that costs less that $25K... and that was the Z28 Camaro. And guess what, it was ugly, and felt cheap inside (much worse than the Subaru, IMO). That's because they had to go cheap on something to keep the price down. So take your pick, cheap interior or cheap drivetrain.



Actually I think that's your "opinion".
sorry I offended you Travis.
Rob x-7 is offline  
Old 01-31-2003, 05:05 PM
  #20  
Super Moderator
 
Rob x-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Amityville, New York
Posts: 12,288
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo II' date='Jan 31 2003, 05:52 PM
get the 2.5 rs front end and head lights
Now your talking!
Rob x-7 is offline  


Quick Reply: Subaru Wrx



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.