Other Cars Non-rotary powered car discussion.

New Skyline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2003 | 09:42 AM
  #41  
Travisty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 331
Default

how can you like the 33 and not the 34 are you crazy.

the 34 is by far the most impressive GTR.

lookwise and performancewise.

it just screams....... dont **** with me

granted the 33 may have a sexier look to it with the curvaceous lines and all but if you were sexy lines then you would get an FD.
Old May 19, 2003 | 09:57 AM
  #42  
MazdaMike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,073
From: Merrick NY / St.John's Uni Jamacia, NY
Default

Originally Posted by FrestyleReaction' date='May 11 2003, 03:18 PM
r35 = ugly.....all other skylines are dayam sexy



and not only skyline can pull off aggressive lines and not curvy...what about FC.... 86....AW11... Z31 and Z32....
ae86?! ok the car has mass cult appeal and is everyones favorite drifter but definatly doesnt have agressive lines...... at all......strongbad says so as the the others i guess so but i was talking about new cars. back in the day, all cars were boxy and the cars u quoted were the smoother ones. today we have much more flowing rounded cars yet the skyline still stands out as being unrefined and strong. i love it
Old May 20, 2003 | 01:44 AM
  #43  
sidewinderx7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,312
From: WA
Default

oooogly
Old May 20, 2003 | 02:28 PM
  #44  
wraith's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 401
From: DE
Default

this:



http://www.skyline-nissan.com/res/images/1...yline_gtr-1.jpg



and this:



http://www.skyline-nissan.com/res/images/gtr-1.jpg



are all i have to say
Old May 21, 2003 | 10:03 PM
  #45  
Srce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,547
Default

R33 all the way!
Old May 23, 2003 | 06:31 AM
  #46  
methanol's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 37
From: Australia
Default

R32 over any of them, simply because there lighter, cheaper and have got basically the same motor, looks are the last thing you have to worry about...
Old May 23, 2003 | 10:03 AM
  #47  
FrestyleFC3S's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,259
From: Schofield Barracks, HI
Default

k i saw more pics yesterday in some jdm mag in mitsuwa ..... now i know why i dont like them:



A- the lights are weird, they dont follow the r32, r33, r34 long horizontal lights, they are long vertical lights like the g35 coupe and 350z, maybe theyre going for a new look now, back to stage 1 but i dont like that



B- its hatchback......wheres the trunk



C- theres no cool spot for a GTR logo AND theyre thinking of making a new GTR logo



anyone else find it weird how g35 stands for 3.5 liters....350z 3.5 liters....but..r35 = 3.5 liters? .... r30 31 32 33 and 34 never stood for their liters....
Old May 23, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #48  
Jerk_Racer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 602
From: Okinawa, Japan
Default

R35? I thought they were going to go with a new chassis code amd not call it with an "R".
Old May 23, 2003 | 04:18 PM
  #49  
DJ Rotor's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,030
From: teh frozen nort
Default

Well the new Skyline/Infiniti G35 is a V35 chassis, depending on how closely related the new GT-R is to that, it'll be either a V35 as well, or something completely different. Or maybe even an R35. Impossible to say.



Some people seem to be under the illusion that the chassis code begins with the same letter as the engine code, always; but that just isn't the case. For example the RB20DET powered Z31s. Or the CA18DET powered S13s.



J
Old May 23, 2003 | 04:33 PM
  #50  
FrestyleFC3S's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,259
From: Schofield Barracks, HI
Default

yea..... mr2 sw20 = 3sgte .... rx7 fc3s = 13b ... i dont htink a lot of people are under that impression if they knw anything about cars



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.