Other Cars Non-rotary powered car discussion.

Got an Evo9 in the shop...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 02:16 AM
  #1  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

All around just a very nice car. Handling is beyond exceptional. Nice midrange powerband, considerable amount of tork for a what it is. Car has a 3" turboback and intake, so its not stock, but close.



Then again I guess a car that cost 30K+ should be nice....
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #2  
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 453
From: A2, MI
Default

The one thing im disappointed on with those cars is that the awd system is front-biased, and will only send up to 50% of the torque rearward, and then only when the fronts are slipping. I mean, it seems to obviously work, but Id prefer a fixed 30/70 or 35/65 front/rear split for predictability's sake
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 12:23 PM
  #3  
j0rd4n's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 222
From: Greenville / Sanford, NC
Default

Originally Posted by toplessFC3Sman' post='814409' date='Apr 17 2006, 01:05 PM

The one thing im disappointed on with those cars is that the awd system is front-biased, and will only send up to 50% of the torque rearward, and then only when the fronts are slipping. I mean, it seems to obviously work, but Id prefer a fixed 30/70 or 35/65 front/rear split for predictability's sake


rgr that, gold leader
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #4  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

I hear thats adjustable on the Wrx cars...
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 08:11 PM
  #5  
cymfc3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,145
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Only on the STi
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 02:18 AM
  #6  
spaceman Spiff's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 504
From: ummm, Oregon
Default

but it can always be fixed by swapping diffs...
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #7  
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,079
From: union, new jersey
Default

http://hkoski.pp.fi/evo/FQ400-Topgear.wmv





shows the good and bad about that car... mostly good
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #8  
Black8's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 553
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by toplessFC3Sman' post='814409' date='Apr 17 2006, 09:05 AM

The one thing im disappointed on with those cars is that the awd system is front-biased, and will only send up to 50% of the torque rearward, and then only when the fronts are slipping. I mean, it seems to obviously work, but Id prefer a fixed 30/70 or 35/65 front/rear split for predictability's sake




I also agree. I hate transverse setups...I wonder how do the engine mounts cope with all that stress....



and no Evo has a shifter as glorious as an RX8......
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 01:12 PM
  #9  
amp's Avatar
amp
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,928
From: New Jersey
Default

you test drove a customers car... with permission id hope
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #10  
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 453
From: A2, MI
Default

well, that video has the Evo FQ400, the highly boosted 400hp version of the evo... with that much boosted power id imagine theyd need to do something or other to the drivetrain... otherwise itd ALWAYS be using the 50-50 split to contain that much power



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.