Other Cars Non-rotary powered car discussion.

Got an Evo9 in the shop...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2006, 02:16 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

All around just a very nice car. Handling is beyond exceptional. Nice midrange powerband, considerable amount of tork for a what it is. Car has a 3" turboback and intake, so its not stock, but close.



Then again I guess a car that cost 30K+ should be nice....
1Revvin7 is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 12:05 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: A2, MI
Posts: 453
Default

The one thing im disappointed on with those cars is that the awd system is front-biased, and will only send up to 50% of the torque rearward, and then only when the fronts are slipping. I mean, it seems to obviously work, but Id prefer a fixed 30/70 or 35/65 front/rear split for predictability's sake
toplessFC3Sman is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 12:23 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
j0rd4n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greenville / Sanford, NC
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by toplessFC3Sman' post='814409' date='Apr 17 2006, 01:05 PM

The one thing im disappointed on with those cars is that the awd system is front-biased, and will only send up to 50% of the torque rearward, and then only when the fronts are slipping. I mean, it seems to obviously work, but Id prefer a fixed 30/70 or 35/65 front/rear split for predictability's sake


rgr that, gold leader
j0rd4n is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 02:06 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

I hear thats adjustable on the Wrx cars...
1Revvin7 is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 08:11 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
cymfc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,145
Default

Only on the STi
cymfc3s is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 02:18 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
spaceman Spiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ummm, Oregon
Posts: 504
Default

but it can always be fixed by swapping diffs...
spaceman Spiff is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 09:50 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: union, new jersey
Posts: 8,079
Default

http://hkoski.pp.fi/evo/FQ400-Topgear.wmv





shows the good and bad about that car... mostly good
FikseRxSeven is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 12:30 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Black8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 553
Default

Originally Posted by toplessFC3Sman' post='814409' date='Apr 17 2006, 09:05 AM

The one thing im disappointed on with those cars is that the awd system is front-biased, and will only send up to 50% of the torque rearward, and then only when the fronts are slipping. I mean, it seems to obviously work, but Id prefer a fixed 30/70 or 35/65 front/rear split for predictability's sake




I also agree. I hate transverse setups...I wonder how do the engine mounts cope with all that stress....



and no Evo has a shifter as glorious as an RX8......
Black8 is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 01:12 PM
  #9  
amp
Super Moderator
 
amp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,928
Default

you test drove a customers car... with permission id hope
amp is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 04:33 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: A2, MI
Posts: 453
Default

well, that video has the Evo FQ400, the highly boosted 400hp version of the evo... with that much boosted power id imagine theyd need to do something or other to the drivetrain... otherwise itd ALWAYS be using the 50-50 split to contain that much power
toplessFC3Sman is offline  


Quick Reply: Got an Evo9 in the shop...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.