Kill------> Rx-2 Vs Rsx Type-s
05-15-2003, 10:10 AM
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20
Baltimore,MD.
I admit that the Type-S is not your average civic. And I pulled 2 cars on him at a slow rate (4-5 seconds a car). But Apex13b is right.........power to weight is everything. I can lift my back wheels off the ground myself.
I admit that the Type-S is not your average civic. And I pulled 2 cars on him at a slow rate (4-5 seconds a car). But Apex13b is right.........power to weight is everything. I can lift my back wheels off the ground myself.
05-15-2003, 10:29 AM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mike is a Liar!
Posts: 4,848
I remember out here at the street races, there used to be a couple of RX-2 and all the lil uneducated Rice boys would talk **** when it was lining up with another car cuz it looks old and not too threatening.. then a few seconds Later .. you would hear, DAMN!!! What does he have in there.. If only they knew what Rotary power could do..
05-17-2003, 07:25 AM
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20
RX-3 are better! There are more parts availible, better suspension, comes factory with 13B (no modifications), engine bay is bigger, and they are a LITTLE bit lighter.
I love my RX-2 though. I really don't like the look of the RX-3 better, but alot of people do. If I had to choose it would be the RX-2. Parts are a little bit harder to find.
I love my RX-2 though. I really don't like the look of the RX-3 better, but alot of people do. If I had to choose it would be the RX-2. Parts are a little bit harder to find.