What Som Guy Thinks.....
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: outside chicago now...soon orlando,fl again
Posts: 348
Rotaries will always be an impractical powerplant. Why do U see people converting their rotaries with a V8. Also why are virtually all cars are piston. In truth, the rotary has sealing, heating, and emissions issues. Bananna shaped combustion chambers R inefficient comparied 2 pistons. Harder to rebuild a rotary compared 2 pistons. In pistons most components are round such as valves, bore, & pistons. That means they are easy to machine and rebuild. If rotary components are damaged, it is trash. The alternating aluminum & iron housings causes corrosion....The fuel consumption is like a V8 but the power output is no better than a 4 cylinder. Just compare with S2000 or Impreza STi turbo if it is turbo. You'll see the rotary neither gets more horsepower, revs higher, or is more fuel efficient. It is silly when people say "it's more reliable and efficient because of fewer moving parts"......this is what some guy thought of his 2nd gen se
#4
Originally Posted by PhoenixDownVII' date='Jan 24 2004, 09:57 AM
Ignorance is Bliss.
I used to try to explain it but meh whatever. I just let people live in their own state of mind now. Not worth my time.
#5
Originally Posted by ColinRX7' date='Jan 24 2004, 02:13 PM
Exactly. Perfect example.
I used to try to explain it but meh whatever. I just let people live in their own state of mind now. Not worth my time.
I used to try to explain it but meh whatever. I just let people live in their own state of mind now. Not worth my time.
But a 3-4 page response pointing out what he said wrong when all of us simply "know better" is just sillyness I tell ya...sillyness...
#6
Haha yeah. Well I work in a diesel shop with mechanics who are in their late 40s, so I always get the "what are you doing wasting your time with them wankel engines" line. I don't even try to explain it I just joke about it with them. They know I love them though.
#7
Let's see...rotaries do get **** for milage, they do blow up a lot (don't give me that tuning bullshit, either...because it still happens), they do put out a lot of emmissions (unless it's a Renesis)...so what was he wrong about? Oh, V8s aren't easier to rebuild.
Now's where you ask me why I drive RX-7s if I don't like rotaries, and I tell you it's because I'm not one of the idiots blowing up my engine, I got better mileage out of my TII than any N/A I know, and I don't care a whole lot about emissions...sorry Mother Earth.
Now's where you ask me why I drive RX-7s if I don't like rotaries, and I tell you it's because I'm not one of the idiots blowing up my engine, I got better mileage out of my TII than any N/A I know, and I don't care a whole lot about emissions...sorry Mother Earth.
#8
Originally Posted by UniqueTII' date='Jan 24 2004, 02:28 PM
Let's see...rotaries do get **** for milage, they do blow up a lot (don't give me that tuning bullshit, either...because it still happens), they do put out a lot of emmissions (unless it's a Renesis)...so what was he wrong about? Oh, V8s aren't easier to rebuild.
Now's where you ask me why I drive RX-7s if I don't like rotaries, and I tell you it's because I'm not one of the idiots blowing up my engine, I got better mileage out of my TII than any N/A I know, and I don't care a whole lot about emissions...sorry Mother Earth.
Now's where you ask me why I drive RX-7s if I don't like rotaries, and I tell you it's because I'm not one of the idiots blowing up my engine, I got better mileage out of my TII than any N/A I know, and I don't care a whole lot about emissions...sorry Mother Earth.
#9
V-8's are not easier to rebuild. Takes 3 hours or so to rebuild a rotary while shooting the **** if you have all the parts and know what you are doing.
Why would it take any longer? The simplest 4 cylinder engine has 40 moving parts while a wankle has 3. So wich would take longer to put together? HMMM...
80 seperate pieces that move vs. 3.
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Why would it take any longer? The simplest 4 cylinder engine has 40 moving parts while a wankle has 3. So wich would take longer to put together? HMMM...
80 seperate pieces that move vs. 3.
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: outside chicago now...soon orlando,fl again
Posts: 348
Originally Posted by defprun' date='Jan 24 2004, 03:46 PM
V-8's are not easier to rebuild. Takes 3 hours or so to rebuild a rotary while shooting the **** if you have all the parts and know what you are doing.
Why would it take any longer? The simplest 4 cylinder engine has 40 moving parts while a wankle has 3. So wich would take longer to put together? HMMM...
80 seperate pieces that move vs. 3.
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Why would it take any longer? The simplest 4 cylinder engine has 40 moving parts while a wankle has 3. So wich would take longer to put together? HMMM...
80 seperate pieces that move vs. 3.
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM