And In This Topic. . .
Well im glad someone took the time to open their eyes. What you said is the exact same I was trying to portray. Unfortunatly everyone jumpped on the bandwagon and attacked me.
Perhaps I should goto a political forum.... *shrug*
Perhaps I should goto a political forum.... *shrug*
I stand by my guns. Dont take the short view, take the long view. I mention this in my previous post in your little thread, but since I'm just a fucktard that cant comprehend anything I read, you might not get my point of view.
And I'm glad of it too.
And I'm glad of it too.
Originally Posted by sidewinderx7' date='Dec 9 2003, 06:22 PM
Well im glad someone took the time to open their eyes.
If anybody had a different opinion then you, you called them a '******* retard.'
And then you get pissed when they call YOU a '******* retard'
They have an opinion just as you.
Quit being such a hypocrite man!
Originally Posted by sidewinderx7' date='Dec 9 2003, 02:22 PM
Well im glad someone took the time to open their eyes. What you said is the exact same I was trying to portray. Unfortunatly everyone jumpped on the bandwagon and attacked me.
Perhaps I should goto a political forum.... *shrug*
Perhaps I should goto a political forum.... *shrug*
Ok now I never talked down to you sidewinder7. I wasn't getting "worked up" either. As I recall I was the only one who replied without attacking you, and calling you names. This is the Place to Have this topic it is Gen. D.
Now you Object. Viet Nam has nothing to do with it. Bombing villages with Napalm was bad. however you couldn't tell who was who in those villages. As I told sidewinder I'm named after a guy who was executed by a vc child. Japan, as I said before Millions of japanese would have been killed, along with hundreds of thousands of GIs if we invaded that place. We also had no Idea what those bombs would do, hell they wern't even sure if they would work on the first try.
I was actually enjoying the debate he and I were having.
Now you Object. Viet Nam has nothing to do with it. Bombing villages with Napalm was bad. however you couldn't tell who was who in those villages. As I told sidewinder I'm named after a guy who was executed by a vc child. Japan, as I said before Millions of japanese would have been killed, along with hundreds of thousands of GIs if we invaded that place. We also had no Idea what those bombs would do, hell they wern't even sure if they would work on the first try.
I was actually enjoying the debate he and I were having.
Originally Posted by rfreeman27' date='Dec 9 2003, 02:49 PM
See, thats what makes you seem conceded.
If anybody had a different opinion then you, you called them a '******* retard.'
And then you get pissed when they call YOU a '******* retard'
They have an opinion just as you.
Quit being such a hypocrite man!
If anybody had a different opinion then you, you called them a '******* retard.'
And then you get pissed when they call YOU a '******* retard'
They have an opinion just as you.
Quit being such a hypocrite man!
Originally Posted by Midnightdriver' date='Dec 9 2003, 03:14 PM
Ok now I never talked down to you sidewinder7. I wasn't getting "worked up" either. As I recall I was the only one who replied without attacking you, and calling you names. This is the Place to Have this topic it is Gen. D.
Now you Object. Viet Nam has nothing to do with it. Bombing villages with Napalm was bad. however you couldn't tell who was who in those villages. As I told sidewinder I'm named after a guy who was executed by a vc child. Japan, as I said before Millions of japanese would have been killed, along with hundreds of thousands of GIs if we invaded that place. We also had no Idea what those bombs would do, hell they wern't even sure if they would work on the first try.
I was actually enjoying the debate he and I were having.
Now you Object. Viet Nam has nothing to do with it. Bombing villages with Napalm was bad. however you couldn't tell who was who in those villages. As I told sidewinder I'm named after a guy who was executed by a vc child. Japan, as I said before Millions of japanese would have been killed, along with hundreds of thousands of GIs if we invaded that place. We also had no Idea what those bombs would do, hell they wern't even sure if they would work on the first try.
I was actually enjoying the debate he and I were having.
Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Dec 9 2003, 02:12 PM
I have no idea what brought this argument on, sidewinderx7 and I'm not sure this forum is the right place for this discussion, but since you have started it I have to say that I agree with you 100%.
Yes I did notice that you were taking many insults. I didn't get to address you Germany one..They were not terrorists either..they have a hole different way to classify that Genocide. He was just a mad man. Oh yes NATO didn't exist yet. And as fare as weapons used aginst military personel he did follow the rules. The only agreement that any country really had was no using of chemical weapons...which he followed..well aginst soldiers anyway.





